Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2012
Experimental efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil implant on high-risk corneal allograft rejection and its biocompatibility in the anterior chamber of rabbits.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xin Meng, Wang Ting, Shi Weiyun, Wu Xianggen
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the immunosuppressive activity of a mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) intraocular-implantable drug delivery system (IDDS) in a rabbit model of high-risk penetrating keratoplasty and to determine the biocompatibility of such a device when implanted in the anterior chamber.
METHODS: Corneal vascularization was induced in New Zealand white rabbits by passing 5-0 silk sutures through the corneal stroma in each quadrant. The corneal neovascularized rabbits received a unilateral 7-mm-diameter central-penetrating keratoplasty. New Zealand white rabbits were used as donors and were divided into 4 treatment groups: the control group, which received no therapy; the 1% MMF eye drop group; the 1.0 mg cyclosporin A (CsA)-IDDS-implanted group; and the 1.0 mg MMF-IDDS-implanted group. Animals were followed up for 150 days, which involved examination of the corneal allografts (opacity, edema, and neovascularization) by slit-lamp biomicroscopy. The survival time of corneal allografts of these animal models was recorded in 4 groups. Histopathologic studies were carried out on the procured specimens of corneal allografts. The biocompatibility of MMF-IDDS in the anterior chamber in rabbits was also investigated.
RESULTS: The mean survival time of corneal allografts in the control and MMF eye drop groups was 18.7±3.0 and 37.5±6.2 days, respectively (P=0.005). Allografts from the CsA-IDDS-implanted group were transparent, except 1 allograft, which showed immune rejection after 130 days. Allografts from the MMF-IDDS-implanted group were transparent throughout the entire observation period. The incidence of allograft rejection was 100% in the control and MMF eye drop groups, respectively. The rejected allografts were much more edematous and more heavily infiltrated with leukocytes than the nonrejected allografts. MMF-IDDS was tolerated well in the anterior chamber, even with 3 MMF-IDDS implanted in the anterior chamber at 1 time.
CONCLUSIONS: MMF-IDDS was able to prolong high-risk allograft survival time and significantly inhibited corneal immune rejection in the rabbit model of penetrating keratoplasty. The device could safely be implanted in the anterior chamber without adverse effects.
METHODS: Corneal vascularization was induced in New Zealand white rabbits by passing 5-0 silk sutures through the corneal stroma in each quadrant. The corneal neovascularized rabbits received a unilateral 7-mm-diameter central-penetrating keratoplasty. New Zealand white rabbits were used as donors and were divided into 4 treatment groups: the control group, which received no therapy; the 1% MMF eye drop group; the 1.0 mg cyclosporin A (CsA)-IDDS-implanted group; and the 1.0 mg MMF-IDDS-implanted group. Animals were followed up for 150 days, which involved examination of the corneal allografts (opacity, edema, and neovascularization) by slit-lamp biomicroscopy. The survival time of corneal allografts of these animal models was recorded in 4 groups. Histopathologic studies were carried out on the procured specimens of corneal allografts. The biocompatibility of MMF-IDDS in the anterior chamber in rabbits was also investigated.
RESULTS: The mean survival time of corneal allografts in the control and MMF eye drop groups was 18.7±3.0 and 37.5±6.2 days, respectively (P=0.005). Allografts from the CsA-IDDS-implanted group were transparent, except 1 allograft, which showed immune rejection after 130 days. Allografts from the MMF-IDDS-implanted group were transparent throughout the entire observation period. The incidence of allograft rejection was 100% in the control and MMF eye drop groups, respectively. The rejected allografts were much more edematous and more heavily infiltrated with leukocytes than the nonrejected allografts. MMF-IDDS was tolerated well in the anterior chamber, even with 3 MMF-IDDS implanted in the anterior chamber at 1 time.
CONCLUSIONS: MMF-IDDS was able to prolong high-risk allograft survival time and significantly inhibited corneal immune rejection in the rabbit model of penetrating keratoplasty. The device could safely be implanted in the anterior chamber without adverse effects.