Journal of affective disorders · 2022
Predictors of symptom reduction following intensive weekend treatment for panic disorder: An exploratory study of veterans.
СтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hunt Christopher, Krauss Alison, Hiatt Emily, Teng Ellen J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Recent evidence implicates intensive panic control treatment (IPCT) - a full panic control treatment protocol compressed into a single weekend - as a viable alternative for Veterans with panic disorder who are unable or unwilling to commit to standard weekly cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). However, no studies to date have examined pretreatment predictors of response to IPCT. Knowledge of such predictors may be important for understanding which Veterans are best suited for IPCT relative to standard CBT.
METHODS: Participants were military Veterans with a primary diagnosis of panic disorder (N = 26) who participated in three open trials of IPCT. Pretreatment predictors were tested within linear regression models used to predict panic disorder severity at 2-week and 6-month follow-up assessments. Pretreatment predictors included: Panic disorder severity, agoraphobic avoidance, PTSD symptoms, anxiety sensitivity, and age.
RESULTS: Pretreatment symptoms of PTSD predicted reduced treatment response at 2-week but not 6-month follow-up, whereas pretreatment anxiety sensitivity predicted reduced response at 6-month but not 2-week follow-up.
LIMITATIONS: Current findings are tempered by the exploratory nature of the analyses and a small sample.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study offers tentative evidence that success in IPCT may be linked to a distinct pretreatment profile relative to that of standard weekly therapy. These preliminary findings should be confirmed in larger studies that directly compare pretreatment predictors of intensive versus standard weekly CBT for panic disorder.
METHODS: Participants were military Veterans with a primary diagnosis of panic disorder (N = 26) who participated in three open trials of IPCT. Pretreatment predictors were tested within linear regression models used to predict panic disorder severity at 2-week and 6-month follow-up assessments. Pretreatment predictors included: Panic disorder severity, agoraphobic avoidance, PTSD symptoms, anxiety sensitivity, and age.
RESULTS: Pretreatment symptoms of PTSD predicted reduced treatment response at 2-week but not 6-month follow-up, whereas pretreatment anxiety sensitivity predicted reduced response at 6-month but not 2-week follow-up.
LIMITATIONS: Current findings are tempered by the exploratory nature of the analyses and a small sample.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study offers tentative evidence that success in IPCT may be linked to a distinct pretreatment profile relative to that of standard weekly therapy. These preliminary findings should be confirmed in larger studies that directly compare pretreatment predictors of intensive versus standard weekly CBT for panic disorder.