Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society · 2016
High Incidence of Dilated Cardiomyopathy After Right Ventricular Inlet Pacing in Patients With Congenital Complete Atrioventricular Block.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tsujii Nobuyuki, Miyazaki Aya, Sakaguchi Heima, Kagisaki Koji, Yamamoto Tetsuya, Matsuoka Michio, Shima Yuriko, Ichikawa Hajime, Ohuchi Hideo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Some patients with congenital complete atrioventricular block (CCAVB) develop dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) after pacemaker implantation (PMI). We evaluated the relationship between pacing site and DCM incidence.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively evaluated 38 patients with CCAVB; 8 (25%) of 32 patients who had PMI developed DCM/heart failure death (HFD) after PMI, although none of the 6 patients without PMI showed DCM/HFD. All DCM/HFD occurred within 50 months of PMI. Among the 32 patients with PMI, the DCM/HFD incidence was 55% (6/11) for right ventricular inlet (RVI), 18% (2/11) for RV apex (RVA), and 0% for left ventricle (LV) (P=0.013). At the endpoint, the LV ejection fraction and septal-to-posterior wall motion delay of patients with LV pacing were better than those for patients with other pacing sites. Among the 8 DCM/HFD patients, 2 in whom the pacing site was changed from RVI to LV apex or in whom therapy was upgraded to cardiac resynchronization remained alive with no heart failure symptoms, whereas the other 6 died of heart failure.
CONCLUSIONS: A total of 25% of the patients who underwent PMI because of CCAVB, but none in the non-PMI group, developed DCM/HFD. DCM/HFD incidence was higher in patients with RVI pacing. Ventricular dyssynchrony related to pacing site may be one cause of DCM in patients with CCAVB. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1251-1258).
METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively evaluated 38 patients with CCAVB; 8 (25%) of 32 patients who had PMI developed DCM/heart failure death (HFD) after PMI, although none of the 6 patients without PMI showed DCM/HFD. All DCM/HFD occurred within 50 months of PMI. Among the 32 patients with PMI, the DCM/HFD incidence was 55% (6/11) for right ventricular inlet (RVI), 18% (2/11) for RV apex (RVA), and 0% for left ventricle (LV) (P=0.013). At the endpoint, the LV ejection fraction and septal-to-posterior wall motion delay of patients with LV pacing were better than those for patients with other pacing sites. Among the 8 DCM/HFD patients, 2 in whom the pacing site was changed from RVI to LV apex or in whom therapy was upgraded to cardiac resynchronization remained alive with no heart failure symptoms, whereas the other 6 died of heart failure.
CONCLUSIONS: A total of 25% of the patients who underwent PMI because of CCAVB, but none in the non-PMI group, developed DCM/HFD. DCM/HFD incidence was higher in patients with RVI pacing. Ventricular dyssynchrony related to pacing site may be one cause of DCM in patients with CCAVB. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1251-1258).