Open forum infectious diseases · 2017
Diagnostic Outcomes After Chest Radiograph Interpretation in Patients With Suspected Tuberculosis and Negative Sputum Smears in a High-Burden Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Tuberculosis Setting.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cudahy Patrick G T, Dawson Rodney, Allwood Brian W, Maartens Gary, Wilson Douglas
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of patients with suspected tuberculosis and negative sputum smears for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) is challenging, especially in high human immunodeficiency virus coinfection settings where sputum smears have lower sensitivity for detecting AFB.
METHODS: We examined the utility of chest radiographs for detecting smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Three hundred sixty sputum smear-negative patients who were referred from primary care clinics in the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa were evaluated. Chest radiographs were read by experienced pulmonologists using a previously validated Chest X-Ray Reading and Recording System (CRRS).
RESULTS: Agreement between observers using CRRS was high at 91% with a Cohen's kappa of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52-0.76). Against a reference standard of sputum culture, sensitivity was 93% (95% CI = 86%-97%), whereas specificity was 14% (95% CI = 10%-19%). Performance against clinical diagnosis (following World Health Organization guidelines) was similar with sensitivity of 92% (95% CI = 88%-95%) and specificity of 20% (95% CI = 13%-28%).
CONCLUSION: The low specificity of CRRS in this setting indicates poor diagnostic utility for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis.
METHODS: We examined the utility of chest radiographs for detecting smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Three hundred sixty sputum smear-negative patients who were referred from primary care clinics in the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa were evaluated. Chest radiographs were read by experienced pulmonologists using a previously validated Chest X-Ray Reading and Recording System (CRRS).
RESULTS: Agreement between observers using CRRS was high at 91% with a Cohen's kappa of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52-0.76). Against a reference standard of sputum culture, sensitivity was 93% (95% CI = 86%-97%), whereas specificity was 14% (95% CI = 10%-19%). Performance against clinical diagnosis (following World Health Organization guidelines) was similar with sensitivity of 92% (95% CI = 88%-95%) and specificity of 20% (95% CI = 13%-28%).
CONCLUSION: The low specificity of CRRS in this setting indicates poor diagnostic utility for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis.