The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2016
Manual MGIT™ system for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: insights from a high TB burden setting.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Quispe R, Valle G A, Huapaya J A, Novoa I, Giraldo J, Caceres T, Gotuzzo E, Zamudio C, Seas C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of manual MGIT™ (MMGIT) compared to the gold standard, Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ), in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in a high-burden setting.
METHODS: Individuals with suspected TB enrolled in parallel diagnostic trials during 2007-2011 were included. Two samples were obtained from each patient and inoculated into MMGIT and LJ medium. Diagnostic tests were performed, and the incremental yield of a second test and time to detection (TTD) were calculated. Analyses were performed per patient and per sample. Gold standard was based on LJ culture.
RESULTS: In the per patient and per sample analysis, we evaluated 1436 patients and 4142 samples. The sensitivity and specificity for smear and MMGIT per sample were respectively 89.9%/92.2% and 97.1%/98.9%. Contamination was observed in 1.4% of samples on MMGIT. The mean TTD (days) was 11.8 for MMGIT and 22.9 for LJ. The sensitivity and specificity for smear and MMGIT per patient were respectively 89.9% and 92.2% and 97.1% and 98.3%. A second MMGIT culture had an incremental yield of 1.6%.
CONCLUSIONS: MMGIT has high sensitivity and specificity, regardless of smear result, with a 50% reduction in TTD compared to LJ. These features make MMGIT an acceptable TB diagnostic method for use in resource-limited settings.
METHODS: Individuals with suspected TB enrolled in parallel diagnostic trials during 2007-2011 were included. Two samples were obtained from each patient and inoculated into MMGIT and LJ medium. Diagnostic tests were performed, and the incremental yield of a second test and time to detection (TTD) were calculated. Analyses were performed per patient and per sample. Gold standard was based on LJ culture.
RESULTS: In the per patient and per sample analysis, we evaluated 1436 patients and 4142 samples. The sensitivity and specificity for smear and MMGIT per sample were respectively 89.9%/92.2% and 97.1%/98.9%. Contamination was observed in 1.4% of samples on MMGIT. The mean TTD (days) was 11.8 for MMGIT and 22.9 for LJ. The sensitivity and specificity for smear and MMGIT per patient were respectively 89.9% and 92.2% and 97.1% and 98.3%. A second MMGIT culture had an incremental yield of 1.6%.
CONCLUSIONS: MMGIT has high sensitivity and specificity, regardless of smear result, with a 50% reduction in TTD compared to LJ. These features make MMGIT an acceptable TB diagnostic method for use in resource-limited settings.