European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2024
Feasibility of remote-access and minimally invasive video-assisted approaches in lateral neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорNetwork Meta-AnalysisНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nguyen Van Cuong, Song Chang Myeon, Ji Yong Bae, Myung Jae Kyung, Park Jeong Seon, Tae Kyung
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and surgical outcomes of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and three remote-access approaches, namely the robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA-R), endoscopic breast-chest approach (BCA-E), and robotic gasless transaxillary approach (GTAA-R) in lateral neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma, compared with conventional transcervical approach (CTA).
METHODS: The literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, covering the period January 2000 to February 2024. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed to compare surgical feasibility, safety, and oncologic outcomes between approaches.
RESULTS: Fourteen articles on lateral neck dissection in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma were included after systematic screening. The number of removed and metastatic lateral lymph nodes, the extent of lateral neck dissection, the rate of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and hypoparathyroidism, serum-stimulated thyroglobulin levels, and recurrence were not significantly different between the MIVAT and three remote-access approaches. Additionally, these were comparable to those of the CTA. However, the MIVAT and remote-access approaches took a longer operative time but provided superior cosmetic outcomes compared to the CTA.
CONCLUSION: Lateral neck dissection using the MIVAT and three remote-access approaches was feasible and comparable to CTA in the number of lymph nodes removed, complications, stimulated thyroglobulin level, and recurrence. The MIVAT and remote-access approaches lasted longer but provided significantly superior cosmetic outcomes compared to the CTA.
METHODS: The literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, covering the period January 2000 to February 2024. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed to compare surgical feasibility, safety, and oncologic outcomes between approaches.
RESULTS: Fourteen articles on lateral neck dissection in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma were included after systematic screening. The number of removed and metastatic lateral lymph nodes, the extent of lateral neck dissection, the rate of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and hypoparathyroidism, serum-stimulated thyroglobulin levels, and recurrence were not significantly different between the MIVAT and three remote-access approaches. Additionally, these were comparable to those of the CTA. However, the MIVAT and remote-access approaches took a longer operative time but provided superior cosmetic outcomes compared to the CTA.
CONCLUSION: Lateral neck dissection using the MIVAT and three remote-access approaches was feasible and comparable to CTA in the number of lymph nodes removed, complications, stimulated thyroglobulin level, and recurrence. The MIVAT and remote-access approaches lasted longer but provided significantly superior cosmetic outcomes compared to the CTA.