Experimental and clinical transplantation : official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
The Challenge of Preoperative Panel Reactive Antibody Positivity in Parathyroid Transplantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Goncu Beyza, Yucesan Emrah, Salepcioglu Kaya Harika, Kazancioglu Rumeyza, Ersoy Yeliz Emine, Akcakaya Adem
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Identifying suitable recipient criteria and matching recipients with appropriate donors are required to increase survival for parathyroid transplant. This study was undertaken to evaluate transplant survival rates while comparing preoperative panel reactive antibody positivity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 14 hypoparathyroidism patients who presented to our clinic for parathyroid transplant. Preoperative ABO compatibility and negative cross-match tests were prioritized for recipient-donor matching, and panel reactive antibody screening tests were performed. During the 24-month follow-up, we evaluated medication use and serum calcium, phosphorus, and parathormone levels of patients.
RESULTS: Preoperative panel reactive antibody positivity was assessed in 3 groups. The HLA class I-positive group (mean fluorescence intensity range, 179-1770) showed decreased medication use and stability in serum calcium levels. The HLA class IIpositive (mean fluorescence intensity range, 85-3959) showed decreased medication use by 25% to 50% and returned to their former prescription doses after 12 months. An opposite pattern was observed in 2 patients with panel reactive antibody positivity for both HLA classes (mean fluorescence intensity range, 462-2289), with 1 patient requiring medication for continuing symptoms and the other patient occasionally taking additional magnesium supplementation, despite decreased medication doses after 12 months. Serum calcium levels remained normal, and parathormone and phosphorus levels were elevated.
CONCLUSIONS: Improving patient symptoms and having no requirement for intravenous calcium replacement are priorities, and monitoring serum levels is the next important step. Varied panel reactive antibody positivities and survival rates indicate a requirement, and each HLA class could require a proper limitation for the mean fluorescence intensity. Preoperative mean fluorescence intensity cut-off value should be <900. Higher mean fluorescence intensity values in panel reactive antibody screenings could increase risk of short-term graft survival after parathyroid transplant. Further studies should include immunological risk assessments by individualizing the outcome with donor-specific antibodies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 14 hypoparathyroidism patients who presented to our clinic for parathyroid transplant. Preoperative ABO compatibility and negative cross-match tests were prioritized for recipient-donor matching, and panel reactive antibody screening tests were performed. During the 24-month follow-up, we evaluated medication use and serum calcium, phosphorus, and parathormone levels of patients.
RESULTS: Preoperative panel reactive antibody positivity was assessed in 3 groups. The HLA class I-positive group (mean fluorescence intensity range, 179-1770) showed decreased medication use and stability in serum calcium levels. The HLA class IIpositive (mean fluorescence intensity range, 85-3959) showed decreased medication use by 25% to 50% and returned to their former prescription doses after 12 months. An opposite pattern was observed in 2 patients with panel reactive antibody positivity for both HLA classes (mean fluorescence intensity range, 462-2289), with 1 patient requiring medication for continuing symptoms and the other patient occasionally taking additional magnesium supplementation, despite decreased medication doses after 12 months. Serum calcium levels remained normal, and parathormone and phosphorus levels were elevated.
CONCLUSIONS: Improving patient symptoms and having no requirement for intravenous calcium replacement are priorities, and monitoring serum levels is the next important step. Varied panel reactive antibody positivities and survival rates indicate a requirement, and each HLA class could require a proper limitation for the mean fluorescence intensity. Preoperative mean fluorescence intensity cut-off value should be <900. Higher mean fluorescence intensity values in panel reactive antibody screenings could increase risk of short-term graft survival after parathyroid transplant. Further studies should include immunological risk assessments by individualizing the outcome with donor-specific antibodies.