European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
Posterior pedicle inferior turbinate flap for recurrent cerebrospinal fluid leak following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dharanipathy Sundarakrishnan, Kumar Amandeep, Agrawal Deepak
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Adequate reconstruction of skull base following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is the most crucial step in reducing postoperative morbidity and mortality. Although, the success rate of traditional nasoseptal flap is very high, specific surgical scenarios preclude its use. A variety of vascularised endonasal and tunnelled scalp flaps have been described in the literature to address such situations. Posterior pedicle inferior turbinate flap (PPITF) is one such locally available vascularised flap.
METHODS: Two patients with recurrent CSF leak following endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma were included. The nasoseptal flap was not available in both patients due to previous surgery. Hence, a PPITF based on the posterolateral nasal artery, a branch of sphenopalatine artery, was harvested and used for skull base reconstruction.
RESULTS: In both patients, CSF leak subsided in the immediate postoperative period. In one patient, sensorium improved and was subsequently discharged in stable condition. Other patient succumbed to meningitis in the postoperative period.
CONCLUSIONS: The PPITF is a valuable alternative to the conventional nasoseptal flap when the latter is not available and it is very important for an endoscopic skull base surgeon to be familiar with the technique of harvesting and using the PPITF.
METHODS: Two patients with recurrent CSF leak following endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma were included. The nasoseptal flap was not available in both patients due to previous surgery. Hence, a PPITF based on the posterolateral nasal artery, a branch of sphenopalatine artery, was harvested and used for skull base reconstruction.
RESULTS: In both patients, CSF leak subsided in the immediate postoperative period. In one patient, sensorium improved and was subsequently discharged in stable condition. Other patient succumbed to meningitis in the postoperative period.
CONCLUSIONS: The PPITF is a valuable alternative to the conventional nasoseptal flap when the latter is not available and it is very important for an endoscopic skull base surgeon to be familiar with the technique of harvesting and using the PPITF.