MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.118.035070

Медицинская библиотека · Circulation · 2018

Reappraisal of Reported Genes for Sudden Arrhythmic Death: Evidence-Based Evaluation of Gene Validity for Brugada Syndrome.

Hosseini S Mohsen, Kim Raymond, Udupa Sharmila, Costain Gregory, Jobling Rebekah, Liston Eriskay, Jamal Seema M, Szybowska Marta, Morel Chantal F, Bowdin Sarah, Garcia John, Care Melanie, Sturm Amy C, Novelli Valeria, Ackerman Michael J, Ware James S, Hershberger Ray E, Wilde Arthur A M, Gollob Michael H, National Institutes of Health Clinical Genome Resource Consortium

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Implicit in the genetic evaluation of patients with suspected genetic diseases is the assumption that the genes evaluated are causative for the disease based on robust scientific and statistical evidence. However, in the past 20 years, considerable variability has existed in the study design and quality of evidence supporting reported gene-disease associations, raising concerns of the validity of many published disease-causing genes. Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an arrhythmia syndrome with a risk of sudden death. More than 20 genes have been reported to cause BrS and are assessed routinely on genetic testing panels in the absence of a systematic, evidence-based evaluation of the evidence supporting the causality of these genes.

METHODS

We evaluated the clinical validity of genes tested by diagnostic laboratories for BrS by assembling 3 gene curation teams. Using an evidence-based semiquantitative scoring system of genetic and experimental evidence for gene-disease associations, curation teams independently classified genes as demonstrating limited, moderate, strong, or definitive evidence for disease causation in BrS. The classification of curator teams was reviewed by a clinical domain expert panel that could modify the classifications based on their independent review and consensus.

RESULTS

Of 21 genes curated for clinical validity, biocurators classified only 1 gene ( SCN5A) as definitive evidence, whereas all other genes were classified as limited evidence. After comprehensive review by the clinical domain Expert panel, all 20 genes classified as limited evidence were reclassified as disputed with regard to any assertions of disease causality for BrS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results contest the clinical validity of all but 1 gene clinically tested and reported to be associated with BrS. These findings warrant a systematic, evidence-based evaluation for reported gene-disease associations before use in patient care.

Для цитирования: Hosseini S Mohsen, Kim Raymond, Udupa Sharmila, Costain Gregory, Jobling Rebekah, Liston Eriskay, Jamal Seema M, Szybowska Marta, Morel Chantal F, Bowdin Sarah, Garcia John, Care Melanie, Sturm Amy C, Novelli Valeria, Ackerman Michael J, Ware James S, Hershberger Ray E, Wilde Arthur A M, Gollob Michael H, National Institutes of Health Clinical Genome Resource Consortium. Reappraisal of Reported Genes for Sudden Arrhythmic Death: Evidence-Based Evaluation of Gene Validity for Brugada Syndrome.. Circulation. 2018. DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.118.035070.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.