Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025
Identifying non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the non-left bundle branch block.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nakamura Toshihiro, Ishibashi Kohei, Useda Nobuhiko, Oka Satoshi, Miyazaki Yuichiro, Wakamiya Akinori, Nakajima Kenzaburo, Kamakura Tsukasa, Wada Mitsuru, Inoue Yuko, Miyamoto Koji, Nagase Satoshi, Aiba Takeshi, Kusano Kengo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an important issue in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and non-left bundle branch block (LBBB). Electrocardiogram-gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography imaging (G-MPI SPECT) is typically used to assess left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. This study aimed to determine whether G-MPI parameters are associated with non-responsiveness to CRT.
METHODS: Between January 2021 and December 2022, 128 patients underwent CRT, of whom 73 with preoperative evaluation using G-MPI were selected. Forty-three patients with non-LBBB (21 and 22 CRT responders and non-responders, respectively) and 30 patients with LBBB were analyzed.
RESULTS: Among patients with non-LBBB, CRT responders and non-responders exhibited no significant differences in baseline characteristics, except for the LV dimension. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 108° and 27.7° as the optimal cutoff values for the bandwidth and phase standard deviation (SD), respectively, to predict non-responsiveness to CRT (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.762; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.601-0.923 and AUC = 0.742; 95% CI 0.576-0.909, respectively). A multivariate analysis revealed that a cutoff bandwidth of ≥ 108° and phase SD of ≥ 27.7° are independent predictors of non-responsiveness to CRT in patients with non-LBBB (hazard ratio 5.65; 95% CI 1.53-20.9; P = 0.009). In contrast, there were no significant associations between G-MPI parameters and non-responsiveness to CRT in patients with LBBB.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative G-MPI might be associated with non-responsiveness to CRT in patients with non-LBBB, indicating that identifying potential non-responders can improve patient management.
METHODS: Between January 2021 and December 2022, 128 patients underwent CRT, of whom 73 with preoperative evaluation using G-MPI were selected. Forty-three patients with non-LBBB (21 and 22 CRT responders and non-responders, respectively) and 30 patients with LBBB were analyzed.
RESULTS: Among patients with non-LBBB, CRT responders and non-responders exhibited no significant differences in baseline characteristics, except for the LV dimension. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 108° and 27.7° as the optimal cutoff values for the bandwidth and phase standard deviation (SD), respectively, to predict non-responsiveness to CRT (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.762; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.601-0.923 and AUC = 0.742; 95% CI 0.576-0.909, respectively). A multivariate analysis revealed that a cutoff bandwidth of ≥ 108° and phase SD of ≥ 27.7° are independent predictors of non-responsiveness to CRT in patients with non-LBBB (hazard ratio 5.65; 95% CI 1.53-20.9; P = 0.009). In contrast, there were no significant associations between G-MPI parameters and non-responsiveness to CRT in patients with LBBB.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative G-MPI might be associated with non-responsiveness to CRT in patients with non-LBBB, indicating that identifying potential non-responders can improve patient management.