European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2025
The mechanistic interaction between mechanical dyssynchrony and filling pressure in cardiac resynchronisation therapy candidates.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Beela Ahmed S, Manetti Claudia A, Prinzen Frits W, Delhaas Tammo, Herbots Lieven, Lumens Joost
Аннотация
AIMS: Both left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony and filling pressure have been shown to be associated with outcome in heart failure patient treated with cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). To investigate the mechanistic link between mechanical dyssynchrony and filling pressure and to assess their combined prognostic value in CRT candidates.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Left atrial pressure (LAP) estimation and quantification of mechanical dyssynchrony were retrospectively performed in 219 CRT patients using echocardiography. LAP was elevated (eLAP) in 49% of the population, normal (nLAP) in 40%, and indeterminate in 11%. CRT response was defined as per cent-decrease in LV end-systolic volume after 12 ± 6 months CRT. Clinical endpoint was all-cause mortality during 4.8 years (interquartile range: 2.7-6.0 years). To investigate the mechanistic link between mechanical dyssynchrony and filling pressure, the CircAdapt computer model was used to simulate cardiac mechanics and haemodynamics in virtual hearts with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and various causes of increased filling pressure. Patients with nLAP had more significant mechanical dyssynchrony than those with eLAP. The combined assessment of both parameters before CRT was significantly associated with reverse LV remodelling and post-CRT survival. Simulations revealed that mechanical dyssynchrony is attenuated by increased LV operational chamber stiffness, regardless of whether it is caused by passive or active factors, explaining the link between mechanical dyssynchrony and filling pressure.
CONCLUSION: Our combined clinical-computational data demonstrate that in patients with LBBB, the presence of mechanical dyssynchrony indicates relatively normal LV compliance and low filling pressure, which may explain their strong association with positive outcomes after CRT.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Left atrial pressure (LAP) estimation and quantification of mechanical dyssynchrony were retrospectively performed in 219 CRT patients using echocardiography. LAP was elevated (eLAP) in 49% of the population, normal (nLAP) in 40%, and indeterminate in 11%. CRT response was defined as per cent-decrease in LV end-systolic volume after 12 ± 6 months CRT. Clinical endpoint was all-cause mortality during 4.8 years (interquartile range: 2.7-6.0 years). To investigate the mechanistic link between mechanical dyssynchrony and filling pressure, the CircAdapt computer model was used to simulate cardiac mechanics and haemodynamics in virtual hearts with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and various causes of increased filling pressure. Patients with nLAP had more significant mechanical dyssynchrony than those with eLAP. The combined assessment of both parameters before CRT was significantly associated with reverse LV remodelling and post-CRT survival. Simulations revealed that mechanical dyssynchrony is attenuated by increased LV operational chamber stiffness, regardless of whether it is caused by passive or active factors, explaining the link between mechanical dyssynchrony and filling pressure.
CONCLUSION: Our combined clinical-computational data demonstrate that in patients with LBBB, the presence of mechanical dyssynchrony indicates relatively normal LV compliance and low filling pressure, which may explain their strong association with positive outcomes after CRT.