MedElevator
Войти в исследования Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2022
Association between sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and risk of bullous pemphigoid in patients with type 2 diabetes: a nationwide population-based cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ma S H, Wu C Y, Lyu Y S, Chou Y J, Chang Y T, Wu C Y
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Certain anti-diabetic agents have been linked to the development of bullous pemphigoid (BP). However, the relationship between BP and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) remains inconclusive.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between SGLT2i usage and BP.
METHODS: Participants were recruited from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database between 2007 and 2018. A total of 149 060 patients with diabetes receiving SGLT2i were matched 1 : 2 with diabetic patients without SGLT2i usage. Factors such as age, sex, duration of diabetes condition, DPP4i usage, insulin usage and selected comorbidities were included in the multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Compared with the control, the 2-year-cumulative incidence was significantly low in patients using SGLT2i after adjustment for competing mortality. Patients with diabetes receiving SGLT2i had a low risk [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.33-0.96] for BP after adjustment for potential confounders. Age (HR, 1.06), renal disease (HR, 1.79), cerebrovascular disease (HR, 3.23), epilepsy (HR, 3.07), DPP4i users (HR: 2.55) and insulin users (HR: 2.56) were significant risk factors for BP.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of BP did not increase in patients receiving SGLT2i. Thus, SGLT2i could be a safe choice for patients with diabetes having additional risk factors or a history of BP.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between SGLT2i usage and BP.
METHODS: Participants were recruited from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database between 2007 and 2018. A total of 149 060 patients with diabetes receiving SGLT2i were matched 1 : 2 with diabetic patients without SGLT2i usage. Factors such as age, sex, duration of diabetes condition, DPP4i usage, insulin usage and selected comorbidities were included in the multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Compared with the control, the 2-year-cumulative incidence was significantly low in patients using SGLT2i after adjustment for competing mortality. Patients with diabetes receiving SGLT2i had a low risk [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.33-0.96] for BP after adjustment for potential confounders. Age (HR, 1.06), renal disease (HR, 1.79), cerebrovascular disease (HR, 3.23), epilepsy (HR, 3.07), DPP4i users (HR: 2.55) and insulin users (HR: 2.56) were significant risk factors for BP.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of BP did not increase in patients receiving SGLT2i. Thus, SGLT2i could be a safe choice for patients with diabetes having additional risk factors or a history of BP.