MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/10428194.2026.2687629

Медицинская библиотека · Leukemia & lymphoma · 2026

Shared decision-making, treatment priorities and communication gaps in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: an Israeli national survey.

Levy Yurkovski Ilana, Sharf Giora, Koren Lea, Tadmor Tamar

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A national cross-sectional survey of 267 Israeli patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) examined patient-hematologist communication, shared decision-making (SDM), and treatment priorities. Perceived adequacy of information was moderate at diagnosis (mean 2.9/5) and higher during treatment selection (mean 3.5/5). Physician-led decision-making predominated (58%), while SDM was reported by only 29.5% of patients; venetoclax-exposed patients were significantly more likely to participate in SDM (OR = 4.93, p = 0.008). Treatment priorities varied, with complete response (36.5%) and quality-of-life (29%) most frequently endorsed; BTKi-exposed patients disproportionately prioritized quality-of-life over response or survival (OR = 3.5, p = 0.027). Overall communication satisfaction and treatment adherence were high, yet 24% of patients lacked any contact channel with their hematologist outside clinic visits. Gender-related differences in communication comfort were also observed. These findings identify important gaps in SDM implementation and communication continuity in modern CLL management that warrant structured interventions.

Для цитирования: Levy Yurkovski Ilana, Sharf Giora, Koren Lea, Tadmor Tamar. Shared decision-making, treatment priorities and communication gaps in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: an Israeli national survey.. Leukemia & lymphoma. 2026. DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2026.2687629.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.