The role of videogame genre and platform in gaming disorder tendencies: A large-scale world-wide study of gamers' preferences.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Literature suggests that individual differences in tendencies toward gaming disorder (GD) may be associated with characteristics of the video games people prefer. We examined how game genre, multiplayer capability, and platform relate to GD tendencies assessed using both APA (DSM-5) and WHO (ICD-11) frameworks in a large international sample of gamers.
METHODS
We analyzed cross-sectional online data from 116,047 gamers. Participants completed validated measures of GD symptoms aligned with DSM-5 and ICD-11 and reported the genre, multiplayer capability, and platform of their currently preferred game. Associations were examined using bivariate and multivariate analyses. We additionally applied a Random Forest model to evaluate the predictive contribution of game-related variables to GD scores.
RESULTS
GD levels were highest among participants preferring games with multiplayer capabilities, while positive associations with shooter and casual games were particularly evident among console users. In contrast, puzzle, platformer, and board games showed negative associations with GD scores. Players preferring desktop or laptop computers reported higher GD scores than those favoring consoles or small devices. In Random Forest models, game genre and multiplayer capability were modestly predictive of GD scores (R ≈ .08-.15) with predictive accuracy being higher for participants who used console and desktop computers and lowest among small-device users.
CONCLUSIONS
Multiplayer capability and preferred genre were consistently related to GD tendencies across DSM-5 and ICD-11 measures. However, these variables alone offered limited predictive power, indicating that GD risk is only partly explained by game characteristics and likely depends on broader individual and contextual factors.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.