[Interest of an internist's consultation in uveitis. Comparative study in 66 cases].

BACKGROUND

After exclusion of a masquerade syndrome, uveitis may be associated with infection, systemic diseases, specific ocular diseases, or may be drug-induced. In order to improve diagnostic strategy in uveitis, we performed a comparative study to assess the importance of internist and ophtalmologist's collaboration and we proposed a well-adapted diagnostic procedure.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

A comparative study was performed in a tertiary centre. The population was divided in two groups. The first one was retrospective and consisted of patients treated at the Ophthalmology department of Croix Rousse Hospital from 1991 to 2002 without internist's collaboration. The second one was prospective and consisted of patients referred in the same centre in 2003 and 2004 with intervention of an internist. Patients of less than 18 years of age with pre-existent diagnosis, specific ocular diseases, toxoplasmosis infection, or with human immunodeficiency virus infection were excluded.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were included. Anterior uveitis was the most frequent form (25 cases), followed by panuveitis (20 cases), posterior uveitis (14) and intermediate uveitis (7). The most frequent cause of uveitis was systemic disease (19 cases) followed by infection (7 cases) and neurological entities (4 cases). The rate of diagnosis was 30.3% without internist's intervention and 60.6% when patients were referred to an internist (P=0,01). The internist intervention was contributive in 75% of diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

The internist intervention significantly enhances the rate of etiological diagnoses in uveitis. These results should further strengthen the internist/ophthalmologist collaboration for patients with uveitis.