Successful launch of robot-assisted mitral valve repair in Japan under universal health coverage.

OBJECTIVES

We compared the clinical outcomes of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation via the robot-assisted approach and small right thoracotomy approach 3 years after the reimbursement of the robot-assisted approach in Japan.

METHODS

Patients who underwent isolated mitral valve repair by minimally invasive approach between 2018 and 2020 from the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database were included. Patients in the robot-assisted approach group were matched to the small right thoracotomy approach group based on propensity scores estimated from patient and surgical characteristics. Perioperative outcomes were compared among all cases as well as in subgroups categorized on the basis of the yearly number of robot-assisted approach cases and small right thoracotomy approach cases (≥10 or <10) at the hospital.

RESULTS

We identified 2443 patients who had undergone isolated mitral valve repair at 250 institutions in the database, and analysis of propensity-matched 577 patient-pairs demonstrated that operation time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and aortic crossclamp time were significantly shorter with the robot-assisted approach. Although the intensive care unit stay was longer in the robot-assisted approach, the time to discharge was significantly shorter in the robot-assisted approach. There was no meaningful difference in the in-hospital mortality. The incidences of postoperative stroke, renal failure, and prolonged ventilation, and the number of patients who converted to mitral valve replacement were similarly low. Procedural time, blood transfusions, explorative procedures for bleeding, postoperative stroke, and prolonged ventilation occurred at a lower rate in the high-volume institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found that the robot-assisted approach is just as effective as the small right thoracotomy approach. The introduction of robot-assisted mitral valve repair in Japan has been successful.