MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12893-020-00842-4

Медицинская библиотека · BMC surgery · 2020

A case report of appendix mucinous adenocarcinoma that recurred after additional surgery and a brief literature review.

Chen Wei, Ye Jun-Wen, Tan Xiao-Ping, Peng Xiang, Zhang Yan, Liang Jing-Lin, Huang Mei-Jin

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The clinical incidence of appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma is low. Moreover, the case reports of postoperative relapse after surgery are rarely based on literature search results. Here, we report such a case spanning nearly 7 years and and review the relevant literature.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year-old female underwent additional surgery after appendectomy, and pathological examination confirmed mucinous adenocarcinoma. The patients underwent HIPEC (hyperthermic intraoperative chemotherapy) and adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-six months after the previous surgeries, another surgery, HIPEC, and adjuvant chemotherapy were performed again due to tumour recurrence. To date, the follow-up time is 43 months, and no recurrence or metastasis has been found.

CONCLUSIONS

Appendix mucinous adenocarcinoma has a poor prognosis and the diagnosis depends on pathological and immunohistochemical examinations. Its clinical manifestations are non-specific, and CRS + HIPEC should be used for treatment, which is safe and effective.

Для цитирования: Chen Wei, Ye Jun-Wen, Tan Xiao-Ping, Peng Xiang, Zhang Yan, Liang Jing-Lin, Huang Mei-Jin. A case report of appendix mucinous adenocarcinoma that recurred after additional surgery and a brief literature review.. BMC surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00842-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.