MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.clae.2024.102321

Медицинская библиотека · Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2024

Artificial intelligence versus conventional methods for RGP lens fitting in keratoconus.

Abadou Jérémy, Dahan Simon, Knoeri Juliette, Leveziel Loic, Bouheraoua Nacim, Borderie Vincent M

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficiency of three artificial intelligence (AI) frameworks (Standard Machine Learning (ML), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Convolution Neural Networks (CNN)) with a reference method (Mean radius of curvature (K)) to predict the posterior radius of curvature of the best-fitted rigid contact lens (RCBFL) in keratoconus eyes.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 197 keratoconus eyes of 135 patients fitted with Rose K2® (Menicon®, Nagoya, Japan) rigid contact lenses with one or more topographies available (MS39®, CSO®, Ferrara, Italy) between January 2020 and September 2022. Two types of topographic data (indices and reconstructed maps from raw data) were used for AI analysis. Three distinct approaches were utilized for leveraging AI: Standard ML methods and MLPs based on topographic indices and CNNs based on topographic maps (i.e., corneal thickness, sagittal, and tangential maps). Seventeen AI framework's accuracies were compared with the r2 determination coefficient of linear regression between predicted and best-fitted radii. Framework accuracies were compared with the Fisher z-transformation of Pearson correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

In multiple linear regression, only three topographic indices (i.e., 3- & 5-mm mean K and Kmax) were significantly associated with RCBFL (p ≤ 0.0001). Compared with the reference method (mean-K; r2 = 0.36), a significantly better RCBFL prediction was achieved with Random Forest using the three topographic indices, MLP using all indices, ResNet18 CNN using anterior topographic maps and CNNs using combined parameters (0.69 ≤ r2 ≤ 0.80; p < 0.05). The best accuracy was obtained with the EfficientNetB0 CNN trained with three maps (r2 = 0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Artificial intelligence methods, particularly CNNs, with corneal topography data of MS39® topographer, have demonstrated superiority over conventional approaches in predicting the posterior curvature radius of Rose K2® rigid contact lenses in patients with keratoconus.

Для цитирования: Abadou Jérémy, Dahan Simon, Knoeri Juliette, Leveziel Loic, Bouheraoua Nacim, Borderie Vincent M. Artificial intelligence versus conventional methods for RGP lens fitting in keratoconus.. Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2024.102321.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.