Journal francais d'ophtalmologie · 2024
Visual rehabilitation with mini scleral contact lenses in scarred corneas.
СтатьяКлинический случайНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kollros L, Torres-Netto E A, Lu N-J, Hillen M, Hafezi F
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To present a case series of patients with corneal scars who were successfully fitted with mini scleral contact lenses (mSCL).
METHODS: Case series study.
RESULTS: Six eyes of six patients with corneal scars were fitted with mSCLs. All scars were situated in the visual axis within the scotopic pupillary zone. The sizes of the scars varied, with the smallest being confined to a central corneal area (case 5) and the largest covering the entire visual axis (case 2). In addition to compromising corneal transparency, these scars also induced significant corneal irregularities, especially in cases 1, 3, and 4. The average corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) with spectacles was 20/80, with a range of 20/200 to 20/40. With the use of mSCLs, CDVA improved to an average of 20/25, ranging from 20/40 to 20/16. The mean visual acuity improvement observed was five optotype lines, with a range of 3 to 7 lines.
CONCLUSION: Corneas with scars often exhibit increased higher-order aberrations (HOA), and affected patients not only experience reduced vision but also suffer from seriously reduced optical quality and optical phenomena such as photophobia. Utilizing mSCLs in such individuals can significantly enhance visual acuity and improve optical side effects resulting from corneal opacity and irregularity.
METHODS: Case series study.
RESULTS: Six eyes of six patients with corneal scars were fitted with mSCLs. All scars were situated in the visual axis within the scotopic pupillary zone. The sizes of the scars varied, with the smallest being confined to a central corneal area (case 5) and the largest covering the entire visual axis (case 2). In addition to compromising corneal transparency, these scars also induced significant corneal irregularities, especially in cases 1, 3, and 4. The average corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) with spectacles was 20/80, with a range of 20/200 to 20/40. With the use of mSCLs, CDVA improved to an average of 20/25, ranging from 20/40 to 20/16. The mean visual acuity improvement observed was five optotype lines, with a range of 3 to 7 lines.
CONCLUSION: Corneas with scars often exhibit increased higher-order aberrations (HOA), and affected patients not only experience reduced vision but also suffer from seriously reduced optical quality and optical phenomena such as photophobia. Utilizing mSCLs in such individuals can significantly enhance visual acuity and improve optical side effects resulting from corneal opacity and irregularity.