MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/icl.0000000000001088

Медицинская библиотека · Eye & contact lens · 2024

Effect of Corneal and Lens Eccentricity Difference on Rigid Corneal Lens Treatment in Patients With Keratoconus.

Kwon Younga, Han Sang Beom, Che Song-A, Koh Kyungmin, Han So Young, Choi Chul Young, Lee Yong Woo

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of rigid corneal lenses (RCL) in patients with keratoconus, based on eccentricity.

METHODS

Eighty-four eyes from 84 patients were included in this retrospective comparative study. Based on the median value of eccentricity difference between the cornea and back surface of the RCL, the patients were divided into groups 1 (<0.08) and 2 (≥0.08). Visual acuity, refractive index, and corneal topography indices were compared before and three months after lens use.

RESULTS

Visual acuity, astigmatism, refractive error, corneal curvature, and corneal thickness improved significantly in both groups. Apical power and anterior elevation improved significantly in group 1, with small differences in eccentricity, but not in group 2. Changes in apical power before and after lens use were significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The RCL was effective for the cornea of keratoconus, especially when the prescription was made with a small difference in eccentricity.

Для цитирования: Kwon Younga, Han Sang Beom, Che Song-A, Koh Kyungmin, Han So Young, Choi Chul Young, Lee Yong Woo. Effect of Corneal and Lens Eccentricity Difference on Rigid Corneal Lens Treatment in Patients With Keratoconus.. Eye & contact lens. 2024. DOI: 10.1097/icl.0000000000001088.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.