MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.02.017

Медицинская библиотека · Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 2024

Efficacy comparison of combining cross-linking and refractive laser ablation in progressive keratoconus: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Achiron Asaf, Yahalomi Tal, Knyazer Boris, Hecht Idan, Elbaz Uri, Spierer Oriel, Livny Eitan, Akowuah Prince Kwaku, Tuuminen Raimo, Avadhanam Venkata S

Систематический обзорМетаанализСтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the effect of combining corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) with refractive laser ablation techniques for the treatment of keratoconus, a progressive corneal disorder.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of combined CXL and refractive techniques. We included all published clinical trials or observational studies published by September 1, 2023. We calculated and compared the standardized mean difference (SMD) between CXL alone and CXL plus laser ablation for uncorrected distance visual acuity, best-corrected distance visual acuity, spherical equivalent manifest refraction, sphere and cylinder, flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), and central corneal thickness.

RESULTS

We identified 13 studies that fulfilled our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 21.3 ± 11.8 months. The CXL plus laser ablation group showed improvement in uncorrected distance visual acuity logMAR (SMD, -0.35; 95% CI, -0.67 to -0.04; p = 0.029), best-corrected distance visual acuity logMAR (SMD, -0.17; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.03; p = 0.014), spherical equivalent manifest refraction (SMD, -0.28; 95% CI, 0.06-0.50; p = 0.013), and change in maximal corneal curvature (Kmax; SMD, -0.41; 95% CI, -0.69 to -0.13; p = 0.004) compared with CXL alone. However, central corneal thickness decreased further among patients who underwent CXL plus laser ablation (SMD, -0.37; 95% CI, -0.66 to -0.07; p = 0.016). No effect was observed in terms of sphere (p = 0.878), cylinder (p = 0.859), K1 (p = 0.907), or K2 (p = 0.169). Ectasia was not observed as an adverse effect resulting from the additional corneal ablation performed during the CXL treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that combining refractive laser ablation techniques with standard or accelerated CXL treatment improved visual and refractive outcomes and anterior corneal curvature values.

Для цитирования: Achiron Asaf, Yahalomi Tal, Knyazer Boris, Hecht Idan, Elbaz Uri, Spierer Oriel, Livny Eitan, Akowuah Prince Kwaku, Tuuminen Raimo, Avadhanam Venkata S. Efficacy comparison of combining cross-linking and refractive laser ablation in progressive keratoconus: systematic review and meta-analysis.. Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.02.017.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.