An evaluation of the RIFLE criteria for acute kidney injury after myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Patients undergoing myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have a higher incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). RIFLE is a newly developed classification for AKI that includes three grades of severity - AKI-R, AKI-I, AKI-F.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to analyse retrospectively major risk factors for AKI at the time of myeloablative allo-HSCT and to use the RIFLE criteria to predict mortality in myeloablative allo-HSCT.
METHODS
Renal function was evaluated in 143 patients with allo-HSCT by RIFLE criteria in order to assess the incidence, risk factors and mortality rate of various degrees of AKI.
RESULTS
The results of this study showed that patients with hepatic veno-occlusive disease (HVOD) have a higher incidence of AKI-F than those without HVOD (P = 0.002). The incidence of AKI-I and AKI-F in patients with grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and increased total bilirubin was significantly higher than in those without (P = 0.001, P <0.001). HVOD was an independent risk factor of AKI-F (OR 5.058, 95% CI 1.317-19.424, P = 0.018), and increased total bilirubin was an independent risk factor for AKI-F (OR 5.126, 95% CI 1.403-18.998, P = 0.014). Worsening RIFLE category was associated with increased mortality of the patients in the 100 days post-transplant (P = 0.003). In addition, 180-day survival of patients in different AKI classes was significantly different (P = 0.0095).
CONCLUSION
AKI is common in patients with myeloablative allo-HSCT and is associated with increased risk of death. The RIFLE criteria appear to be an important tool for stratification of these patients on the basis of death risk.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.