MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/eus.0000000000000017

Медицинская библиотека · Endoscopic ultrasound · 2023

EUS-guided therapies for primary and secondary prophylaxis in gastric varices-An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chandan Saurabh, Nguyen Andrew Khoi, Mohan Babu P, Deliwala Smit, Ramai Daryl, Kassab Lena L, Muthusamy Arunkumar, Facciorusso Antonio, Kamal Faisal, Bilal Mohammad, Samanta Jayanta, Adler Douglas G

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

Gastric varices (GVs) are associated with a higher risk of uncontrolled bleeding and death when compared with esophageal varices. While endoscopic glue injection therapy has been traditionally used for secondary prophylaxis in GV, data regarding primary prophylaxis continue to emerge. Recently, EUS-guided therapies have been used in GV bleeding.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of several major databases from inception to June 2022. Our primary goals were to estimate the pooled rates of treatment efficacy, GV obliteration, GV recurrence, and rebleeding with EUS-guided therapy in primary and secondary prophylaxis. Overall adverse events and technical failures were assessed. Random-effects model was used for our meta-analysis, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 % statistics.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies with 604 patients were included. In primary prophylaxis, pooled rate of GV obliteration was 90.2% (confidence interval [CI], 81.1-95.2; I2 = 0). With combination EUS-glue and coil therapy, the rate was 95.4% (CI, 86.7%-98.5%; I2 = 0). Pooled rate of posttherapy GV bleeding was 4.9% (CI, 1.8%-12.4%; I2 = 0). In secondary prophylaxis, pooled rate of treatment efficacy was 91.9% (CI, 86.8%-95.2%; I2 = 12). With EUS-glue, EUS-coil, and combination EUS-glue and coil, the rates were 94.3% (CI, 88.9%-97.1%; I2 = 0), 95.5% (CI, 80.3%-99.1%; I2 = 0), and 88.7% (CI, 76%-95.1%; I2 = 14), respectively. Pooled rate of GV obliteration was 83.6% (CI, 71.5%-91.2%; I2 = 74). With EUS-glue, EUS-coil, and combination EUS-glue and coil, the rates were 84.6% (CI, 75.9%-90.6%; I2 = 31), 92.3% (CI, 81.1%-97.1%; I2 = 0), and 84.5% (CI, 50.8%-96.7%; I2 = 75), respectively. Pooled rates of GV rebleeding and recurrence were 18.1% (CI, 13.1%-24.3%; I2 = 16) and 20.6% (CI, 9.3%-39.5%; I2 = 66), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis shows that EUS-guided therapy for GVs is technically feasible and clinically successful in both primary and secondary prophylaxis of GV.

Для цитирования: Chandan Saurabh, Nguyen Andrew Khoi, Mohan Babu P, Deliwala Smit, Ramai Daryl, Kassab Lena L, Muthusamy Arunkumar, Facciorusso Antonio, Kamal Faisal, Bilal Mohammad, Samanta Jayanta, Adler Douglas G. EUS-guided therapies for primary and secondary prophylaxis in gastric varices-An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.. Endoscopic ultrasound. 2023. DOI: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000017.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.