MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00006982-200204000-00007

Медицинская библиотека · Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2002

Types of macular holes encountered during diabetic vitrectomy.

Ghoraba Hammouda

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To determine the types of macular holes encountered during vitrectomy for complicated cases of diabetic retinopathy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of consecutive cases of macular holes diagnosed either before or during pars plana vitrectomy for complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy over a 6-year period. The morphology of these holes is described. Possible mechanisms of their development, surgical considerations, and results after a follow-up of at least 3 months are discussed.

RESULTS

Nineteen consecutive cases of macular holes associated with proliferative diabetic retinopathy were reviewed over a 6-year period. Five cases were lamellar and 14 were full thickness. The 14 cases of full thickness macular holes occurred in patients with the following conditions: tractional rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (5); tractional retinal detachment (3); premacular hemorrhage (3); and cystic macular edema (3). Closure of the full thickness holes was achieved in 8 of 11 patients who were followed up for at least 3 months. All the patients had visual improvement, but no patient had a visual acuity of better than 20/100.

CONCLUSION

Macular holes may occur in proliferative diabetic retinopathy in different configurations. Full thickness macular holes can be closed in most cases. Functional improvement can be achieved.

Для цитирования: Ghoraba Hammouda. Types of macular holes encountered during diabetic vitrectomy.. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2002. DOI: 10.1097/00006982-200204000-00007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.