MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.07.005

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of bodywork and movement therapies · 2016

A concise rehabilitation protocol for sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain.

Noormohammadpour Pardis, Tayyebi Fereshte, Mansournia Mohammad Ali, Sharafi Elham, Kordi Ramin

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

There is increasing evidence in support of multidisciplinary approaches for management of chronic neck pain. Although presence of different team members is one of the strengths of these approaches, it can limit the access to these treatments. The main objective of this study is designing and investigating the efficacy of a concise rehabilitation program. Thirty-nine patients with sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain underwent an 8-week rehabilitation program. Baseline and 8 weeks' follow-up data regarding neck pain (visual analog scale, neck disability index and quality of life) were compared using paired T test. After eight weeks of study, pain and disability significantly decreased: -3.8 of 10 (95% CI: -4.6 to -3.0) (p-value < 0.001) for pain and -18.4 of 100 (95% CI: -23.7 to -13.2) (p-value < 0.001) for disability. Also, all SF-36 domain scales improved significantly. By using this concise rehabilitation approach, pain, disability, and quality of life improved significantly in patients with sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain.

Для цитирования: Noormohammadpour Pardis, Tayyebi Fereshte, Mansournia Mohammad Ali, Sharafi Elham, Kordi Ramin. A concise rehabilitation protocol for sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain.. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.07.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.