Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2013
Apathy and health-related quality of life in stroke.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tang Wai-Kwong, Lau Chieh Grace, Mok Vincent, Ungvari Gabor S, Wong Ka-Sing
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in stroke survivors with and without apathy.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Acute stroke unit in a regional hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: Stroke survivors (N=391) recruited from the acute stroke unit.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants were divided into apathy and nonapathy groups. Participants who scored ≥36 on the Apathy Evaluation Scale, clinician's version formed the apathy group. HRQOL was measured with the 2 component scores, mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS), of the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). Demographic and clinical information were obtained with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel Index (BI), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).
RESULTS: Thirty-six (9%) participants had apathy. The apathy group had significantly lower MCS and PCS scores. After adjusting for sex, education, diabetes mellitus, and NIHSS, MMSE, GDS, and BI scores, the MCS score in the apathy group remained significantly lower.
CONCLUSIONS: Apathy has a significant negative effect on HRQOL in stroke survivors, particularly on their mental health. Interventions for apathy could improve the HRQOL of stroke survivors.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Acute stroke unit in a regional hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: Stroke survivors (N=391) recruited from the acute stroke unit.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants were divided into apathy and nonapathy groups. Participants who scored ≥36 on the Apathy Evaluation Scale, clinician's version formed the apathy group. HRQOL was measured with the 2 component scores, mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS), of the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). Demographic and clinical information were obtained with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel Index (BI), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).
RESULTS: Thirty-six (9%) participants had apathy. The apathy group had significantly lower MCS and PCS scores. After adjusting for sex, education, diabetes mellitus, and NIHSS, MMSE, GDS, and BI scores, the MCS score in the apathy group remained significantly lower.
CONCLUSIONS: Apathy has a significant negative effect on HRQOL in stroke survivors, particularly on their mental health. Interventions for apathy could improve the HRQOL of stroke survivors.