MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.03.031

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2006

Preferred methods of excess hair removal in pediatric patients with lung transplantation.

Fisher Emily J, Berk David R, Greene Riley E, Shaner Pegi, Sweet Stuart C, Mallory Susan Bayliss

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Hypertrichosis is common among recipients of lung transplantation taking cyclosporine and it poses a special psychosocial problem in children. Children and parents frequently inquire about methods of hair removal.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine preferred methods of hair removal in this population.

METHODS

We distributed a questionnaire to 104 pediatric recipients of lung transplantation. A total of 56 questionnaires (54%) were completed.

RESULTS

Of respondents, 91% (51 of 56) experienced hypertrichosis, 75% (38 of 51) of whom attempted treatment. Depilatory cream was the most common hair removal technique (79%, 30 of 38). Shaving, particularly with an electric razor, received the highest ratings of both satisfaction and likelihood of future use.

LIMITATIONS: Generalizability is limited by the response rate. Preferred methods according to different hair locations were not evaluated.

CONCLUSION

In our pediatric transplantation population, depilatory cream was the most commonly used treatment for hypertrichosis whereas electric shaving had the highest ratings of satisfaction and future use.

Для цитирования: Fisher Emily J, Berk David R, Greene Riley E, Shaner Pegi, Sweet Stuart C, Mallory Susan Bayliss. Preferred methods of excess hair removal in pediatric patients with lung transplantation.. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.03.031.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.