MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00402-024-05535-8

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024

Differences in gait analysis and clinical outcome after dynamic fixation or screw fixation in acute syndesmosis tear: a prospective randomized pilot study.

Mick Paul, Doll Julian, Müller Michelle, Schmidmaier Gerhard, Renkawitz Tobias, Campos Sarah, Wolf Sebastian I, Tsitlakidis Stefanos

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Acute syndesmosis tears can be treated by static screw or dynamic fixation. Various studies have compared these techniques regarding postoperative outcome. However, to our knowledge, no study has used 3D-instrumented gait analysis (IGA). We hypothesized that a dynamic fixation would perform non-inferior to screw fixation in terms of biomechanical and clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Patients were prospectively randomized to both groups. All patients received the same follow-up rehabilitation and consultations (6 and 12 weeks; 6 and 12 months) postoperatively. Standardized questionnaires were used to objectify pain and ankle function. At 6 months follow-up, IGA was conducted additionally to objectify the biomechanical outcome.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients in the dynamic fixation (DF) group using TightRope® and twenty-five in the screw fixation group (SF) completed gait analysis. The DF group showed significantly higher mean values for maximum moment in the affected ankle joint (DF: 1.40 ± 0.21 Nm, SF: 1.23 ± 0.30 Nm; p = 0.023) and the unaffected ankle joint (DF: 1.52 ± 0.20 Nm, SF: 1.37 ± 0.27 Nm; p = 0.035). The difference between the affected and unaffected ankle joint was significantly higher in the SF group for active plantarflexion (DF: 1.52 ± 0.20°, SF: 1.37 ± 0.27°; p = 0.035). Both dynamic and screw fixation groups exhibited significantly reduced plantarflexion during the push-off and early swing phase, with moments and powers in the ankle joint also significantly impaired.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that dynamic fixation has better or similar biomechanical and clinical outcomes compared to screw fixation. Future research should focus on biomechanical differences during gait as well as clinical outcomes in case of earlier weight-bearing after dynamic fixation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER (TRN): DRKS00013562 Date of Registration: 07/12/2017.

Для цитирования: Mick Paul, Doll Julian, Müller Michelle, Schmidmaier Gerhard, Renkawitz Tobias, Campos Sarah, Wolf Sebastian I, Tsitlakidis Stefanos. Differences in gait analysis and clinical outcome after dynamic fixation or screw fixation in acute syndesmosis tear: a prospective randomized pilot study.. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05535-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.