A Modified Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces the Occurrence of Tension Blisters Around Negative Pressure Dressings.

BACKGROUND

To date, there is no effective solution for preventing the formation of blisters around negative-pressure wound dressings. In this study, we aim to address this problem and identify techniques to improve the negative-pressure drainage technique.

METHODS

A total of 129 patients from 2021.11 to 2022.11 who were previously treated in Fuyang People's Hospital were included in this retrospective analysis. All patients had negative-pressure drainage dressings applied to their wounds after undergoing thorough wound debridement. The patients were divided into the following groups: a traditional treatment group and a modified treatment group. The traditional treatment group comprised 60 patients who received negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and a modified treatment group comprised 69 patients who received NPWT plus Vaseline gauze. The dressing coverage area, wound location, incidence of blisters around the dressing 3 days after NPWT, wound infection rate, and length of hospitalization were recorded. The incidence of blisters, wound infection rate, and wound location in the 2 groups were included as the categorical data and were compared using a chi-squared test. The dressing coverage area and length of hospitalization in the 2 groups were included as the quantitative data and were compared using an independent samples t test or with the Mann-Whitney test if the data were abnormally distributed.

RESULTS

The incidence rates of blisters in the traditional and modified treatment groups were 33.3% (20/60) and 13.0% (9/69), respectively, displaying a statistically significant difference (χ2 = 7.581, P = .006). The infection rates of the 2 groups were 38.3% (23/60) and 20.3% (14/69), respectively, showing a statistically significant difference (χ2 = 5.108; P = .024). The lengths of hospitalization in the 2 groups were 26.05 ± 14.74 days and 18.17 ± 7.54 days, respectively, showing a statistically significant difference (t = 3.892; P = .000). The dressing coverage areas were 150 cm2 (88.75 cm2, 600 cm2) and 150 cm2 (124 cm2, 600 cm2), respectively, showing no statistical difference (P = .759).

CONCLUSION

Modified NPWT can effectively reduce the incidence of blisters, length of hospitalization, and infection rate of patients.