Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2019
Usefulness of non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging prior to venous interventions.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kusiak Agnieszka, Budzyński Jacek
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The number of venous interventions continues to rise. The outcome of venous procedures is related to appropriate stent selection and implantation.
AIM: To compare the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in the determination of target vein section area (VSA) as techniques for selecting an appropriate diameter for a venous stent.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: VSAs of iliac and common femoral veins obtained in contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) and non-contrast-enhanced MRI (NCE-MRI) were calculated for 18 consecutive patients with post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), and VSAs obtained using IVUS were calculated for 15 of these PTS patients.
RESULTS: The differences in iliac and common femoral vein VSAs obtained using CE-MRI and NCE-MRI were small and not clinically significant. VSAs of vessels obtained using CE-MRI and NCE-MRI correlated significantly with each other, with R values in the range 0.87-0.97 and p-values < 0.001. However, no significant relationships were found between section areas measured using MRI and IVUS and the differences in measurements was, on average, to 60%.
CONCLUSIONS: CE magnetic resonance venography can be replaced by Dixon-based NCE-MRI in the preoperative evaluation of patients with PTS who qualify for venous intervention. However, CE-MRI and NCE-MRI performed for ipsilateral and contralateral extremities are not sufficient for appropriate venous stent selection, and IVUS remains a necessary tool in determining venous intervention in iliac veins.
AIM: To compare the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in the determination of target vein section area (VSA) as techniques for selecting an appropriate diameter for a venous stent.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: VSAs of iliac and common femoral veins obtained in contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) and non-contrast-enhanced MRI (NCE-MRI) were calculated for 18 consecutive patients with post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), and VSAs obtained using IVUS were calculated for 15 of these PTS patients.
RESULTS: The differences in iliac and common femoral vein VSAs obtained using CE-MRI and NCE-MRI were small and not clinically significant. VSAs of vessels obtained using CE-MRI and NCE-MRI correlated significantly with each other, with R values in the range 0.87-0.97 and p-values < 0.001. However, no significant relationships were found between section areas measured using MRI and IVUS and the differences in measurements was, on average, to 60%.
CONCLUSIONS: CE magnetic resonance venography can be replaced by Dixon-based NCE-MRI in the preoperative evaluation of patients with PTS who qualify for venous intervention. However, CE-MRI and NCE-MRI performed for ipsilateral and contralateral extremities are not sufficient for appropriate venous stent selection, and IVUS remains a necessary tool in determining venous intervention in iliac veins.