MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s1726-4901(09)70189-3

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2006

Sarcoma of the larynx: treatment results and literature review.

Liu Chia-Yu, Wang Mao-Che, Li Wing-Yin, Chang Shyue-Yi, Chu Pen-Yuan

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Sarcomas of the larynx are rare neoplasms that constitute less than 1% of laryngeal malignancies. A Medline search found no large series focusing on laryngeal sarcomas. We reviewed the cases of laryngeal sarcomas treated in our cancer center and compared our experiences and treatment results with those from other centers.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 10 patients with laryngeal sarcoma treated in our institute between 1980 and 2000 was done to identify tumor characteristics, therapeutic modalities, and treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

The patients showed a male predominance (9/10) and presented 8 types of pathology. Nine patients underwent surgery, including 2 total laryngectomy, 4 partial laryngectomy, and 3 endoscopic laser cordectomy. During a median follow-up of 92 months, the 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival were 76% and 90%, respectively. Two patients developed recurrence, including 1 local recurrence and 1 distant metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Surgical intervention was the first choice in the treatment of laryngeal sarcomas. The prognosis is relatively good when compared with sarcoma originating from other anatomic sites.

Для цитирования: Liu Chia-Yu, Wang Mao-Che, Li Wing-Yin, Chang Shyue-Yi, Chu Pen-Yuan. Sarcoma of the larynx: treatment results and literature review.. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/s1726-4901(09)70189-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.