Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020
Prognostic Value of Nodal Matting on MRI in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ma Huali, Qiu Yinyi, Li Haojiang, Xie Fei, Ruan Guangying, Liu Lizhi, Cui Chunyan, Dong Annan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Nodal (N) stage is one of the most important predictors for distant metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. It may ignore potentially useful nodal features, such as nodal matting (three or more lymph nodes abutting together with the absence of intervening fat planes).
PURPOSE: To explore the prognostic value of nodal matting in NPC patients and construct a nomogram with nodal matting for predicting distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).
STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.
POPULATION: In all, 792 NPC patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy from 2010 to 2013 were enrolled with 2:1 training (n = 527) and validation (n = 65) cohorts.
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: T1 - and T2 -weighted imaging at 1.5 or 3.0T.
ASSESSMENT: Nodal matting and other nodal characteristics were assessed with MRI. MR images were evaluated separately by three radiologists. The association between nodal matting and DMFS was analyzed.
STATISTICAL TESTS: Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Nomograms were constructed from a multivariate logistic regression model with and without nodal matting. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomograms were determined by concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves. The results were validated using bootstrap resampling and validation cohort.
RESULTS: The incidence of nodal matting was 24.6% (195/792) in all patients. In the training cohort, nodal matting was independently associated with DMFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.97 [1.05-3.69], P < 0.05). N1 patients with nodal matting had worse DMFS than N1 patients without (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed when comparing N1 patients with nodal matting to N2 patients (P = 0.464). The C-index of the nomogram with nodal matting was higher than the nomogram without (0.717 vs. 0.699, P = 0.084).
DATA CONCLUSION: Nodal matting was an independent prognostic factor for DMFS in NPC patients. It may help to select patients at high risk of distant metastasis.
PURPOSE: To explore the prognostic value of nodal matting in NPC patients and construct a nomogram with nodal matting for predicting distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).
STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.
POPULATION: In all, 792 NPC patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy from 2010 to 2013 were enrolled with 2:1 training (n = 527) and validation (n = 65) cohorts.
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: T1 - and T2 -weighted imaging at 1.5 or 3.0T.
ASSESSMENT: Nodal matting and other nodal characteristics were assessed with MRI. MR images were evaluated separately by three radiologists. The association between nodal matting and DMFS was analyzed.
STATISTICAL TESTS: Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Nomograms were constructed from a multivariate logistic regression model with and without nodal matting. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomograms were determined by concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves. The results were validated using bootstrap resampling and validation cohort.
RESULTS: The incidence of nodal matting was 24.6% (195/792) in all patients. In the training cohort, nodal matting was independently associated with DMFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.97 [1.05-3.69], P < 0.05). N1 patients with nodal matting had worse DMFS than N1 patients without (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed when comparing N1 patients with nodal matting to N2 patients (P = 0.464). The C-index of the nomogram with nodal matting was higher than the nomogram without (0.717 vs. 0.699, P = 0.084).
DATA CONCLUSION: Nodal matting was an independent prognostic factor for DMFS in NPC patients. It may help to select patients at high risk of distant metastasis.