The role of bronchoscopy in diagnosis of chronic cough in adults: a retrospective single-center study.

INTRODUCTION

Cough is one of the most frequent symptoms reported to pulmonologists. The role of bronchoscopy in the diagnostic work-up of chronic cough is not clearly defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) and additional testing of samples collected during FOB in the differential diagnosis of chronic cough in adults.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study. Out of 7115 conventional white light FOB examinations, we finally selected 198 with cough as the only indication.

RESULTS

In 40.9% of bronchoscopic examinations, no visible cause of cough was found. Visual signs of chronic bronchitis (CB) were detected in 57.6% of reports. Only in 3 cases (1.5%) bronchoscopy revealed a potential cause of chronic cough other than CB. Mycobacterium tuberculosis or other mycobacteria were spotted in none of the samples. In 91.1% of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cytologic examinations, at least one cell count abnormality was detected, but only in case of increased percentage of eosinophils, it might be considered clinically relevant. In 53% of bacteriological culture results, at least one potentially pathogenic bacterium was isolated.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study results strengthen the evidence that FOB combined with additional testing of airway specimens obtained during FOB is not a powerful tool in the differential diagnosis of chronic cough, and FOB as a diagnostic tool may be overused. The appropriate timing and decision regarding referral for FOB and additional testing of achieved material requires careful clinical consideration.