MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 1994

Adult respiratory distress syndrome: outcome in a community hospital.

Willms D, Nield M, Gocka I

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Published reports indicate that survival rates of patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome have not improved dramatically since the first report of the condition in 1967. However, changes in ventilator strategies and improved critical care management may result in better survival rates in patients with well-defined, severe adult respiratory distress syndrome.

OBJECTIVES

To report the outcomes of patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome treated in a community hospital and compare these findings with those in previously published reports.

METHODS

A retrospective study design was used. All patients diagnosed with adult respiratory distress syndrome (N = 47) over a 2-year period were studied.

RESULTS

For the study patients, the survival rate was 64%; 29% died from respiratory failure alone. Analysis demonstrated that advanced age was not associated with mortality. Pressure-control ventilation was used for 31 patients and there was no significant difference in the presence of barotrauma in the pressure-control mode vs volume ventilation.

CONCLUSION

This survival rate exceeds most recently reported rates and thus supports the idea that improvement in treatment of adult respiratory distress syndrome is occurring.

Для цитирования: Willms D, Nield M, Gocka I. Adult respiratory distress syndrome: outcome in a community hospital.. American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. 1994.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.