Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) · 1993
Airway pressure release ventilation.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Davis K, Johnson D J, Branson R D, Campbell R S, Johannigman J A, Porembka D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Elevated airway pressures during mechanical ventilation are associated with hemodynamic compromise and pulmonary barotrauma. We studied the cardiopulmonary effects of a pressure-limited mode of ventilation (airway pressure release ventilation) in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome.
METHODS: Fifteen patients requiring intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were studied. Following measurement of hemodynamic and ventilatory data, all patients were placed on airway pressure release ventilation (APRV). Cardiorespiratory measurements were repeated after a 2-hour stabilization period.
RESULTS: During ventilatory support with APRV, peak inspiratory pressure (62 +/- 10 vs 30 +/- 4 cm H2O) and PEEP (11 +/- 4 vs 7 +/- 2 cm H2O) were reduced compared with IMV. Mean airway pressure was higher with APRV (18 +/- 5 vs 24 +/- 4 cm H2O). There were no statistically significant differences in gas exchange or hemodynamic variables. Both cardiac output (8.7 +/- 1.8 vs 8.4 +/- 2.0 L/min) and partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (79 +/- 9 vs 86 +/- 11 mm Hg) were essentially unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that while airway pressure release ventilation can provide similar oxygenation and ventilation at lower peak and end-expiratory pressures, this offers no hemodynamic advantages.
METHODS: Fifteen patients requiring intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were studied. Following measurement of hemodynamic and ventilatory data, all patients were placed on airway pressure release ventilation (APRV). Cardiorespiratory measurements were repeated after a 2-hour stabilization period.
RESULTS: During ventilatory support with APRV, peak inspiratory pressure (62 +/- 10 vs 30 +/- 4 cm H2O) and PEEP (11 +/- 4 vs 7 +/- 2 cm H2O) were reduced compared with IMV. Mean airway pressure was higher with APRV (18 +/- 5 vs 24 +/- 4 cm H2O). There were no statistically significant differences in gas exchange or hemodynamic variables. Both cardiac output (8.7 +/- 1.8 vs 8.4 +/- 2.0 L/min) and partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (79 +/- 9 vs 86 +/- 11 mm Hg) were essentially unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that while airway pressure release ventilation can provide similar oxygenation and ventilation at lower peak and end-expiratory pressures, this offers no hemodynamic advantages.