Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 1997
Contrast sensitivity in diabetic pregnancy.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hellstedt T, Kaaja R, Teramo K, Immonen I
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between the changes in contrast sensitivity and retinopathy throughout pregnancy in diabetic women with mild background diabetic retinopathy.
METHODS: Contrast sensitivity (Vistech 6500 Contrast Test System) was measured in 22 type I diabetic women with mild background retinopathy [0-16 microaneurysms (MAs)/eye and occasional small intraretinal hemorrhages] and 10 healthy pregnant women at the 12th and 32nd weeks of pregnancy and 3 months after delivery. Red-free fundus photography was also performed at all visits.
RESULTS: Throughout pregnancy contrast sensitivity was lower in the diabetics than in the controls at 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 cycles per degree (cpd). During the course of pregnancy, contrast sensitivity decreased at 1.5 and 6.0 cpd in patients with more than five new MAs compared to those with fewer than five new MAs during pregnancy. Likewise, contrast sensitivity decreased at 6 cpd in patients with an increase in MA count during pregnancy and at 6 and 12 cpd in patients with a baseline MA count of two or more MAs.
CONCLUSIONS: Contrast sensitivity, especially at low to mid-range spatial frequencies, is decreased in diabetic women with mild retinopathy. Even small changes in retinopathy are reflected in a decrease in contrast sensitivity during and after pregnancy. Thus, contrast sensitivity seems to be a sensitive indicator of changes in minimal background retinopathy.
METHODS: Contrast sensitivity (Vistech 6500 Contrast Test System) was measured in 22 type I diabetic women with mild background retinopathy [0-16 microaneurysms (MAs)/eye and occasional small intraretinal hemorrhages] and 10 healthy pregnant women at the 12th and 32nd weeks of pregnancy and 3 months after delivery. Red-free fundus photography was also performed at all visits.
RESULTS: Throughout pregnancy contrast sensitivity was lower in the diabetics than in the controls at 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 cycles per degree (cpd). During the course of pregnancy, contrast sensitivity decreased at 1.5 and 6.0 cpd in patients with more than five new MAs compared to those with fewer than five new MAs during pregnancy. Likewise, contrast sensitivity decreased at 6 cpd in patients with an increase in MA count during pregnancy and at 6 and 12 cpd in patients with a baseline MA count of two or more MAs.
CONCLUSIONS: Contrast sensitivity, especially at low to mid-range spatial frequencies, is decreased in diabetic women with mild retinopathy. Even small changes in retinopathy are reflected in a decrease in contrast sensitivity during and after pregnancy. Thus, contrast sensitivity seems to be a sensitive indicator of changes in minimal background retinopathy.