MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012421

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2016

Comprehensive analysis of intra-arterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke due to cervical artery dissection.

Jensen Judd, Salottolo Kristin, Frei Donald, Loy David, McCarthy Kathryn, Wagner Jeffrey, Whaley Michelle, Bellon Richard, Bar-Or David

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The safety and efficacy of intra-arterial treatment (IAT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to cervical artery dissection (CeAD) has not been formally studied. The purpose of this study was twofold: first, describe a large series with CeAD treated with IAT; second, analyze outcomes with CeAD receiving IAT versus (a) CeAD not treated with IAT, (b) CeAD receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) alone, and (c) non-CeAD mechanism of AIS receiving IAT.

DESIGN

Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were summarized for all CeAD patients treated with IAT from January 2010 to May 2015. Outcomes included favorable 90 day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b-3), procedural complications, and mortality. Outcomes were analyzed with χ2 tests and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were 161 patients with CeAD: 24 were treated with IAT and comprised our target population. Dissections were more common in the internal carotid (n=18) than in the vertebral arteries (n=6). All but one patient had intracranial embolus. IAT techniques included thrombectomy (n=19), IA thrombolysis (n=17), stent (n=14), and angioplasty (n=7). Outcomes included favorable 90 day mRS score of 0-2 in 63%, 4 deaths, 1 sICH, and 3 procedural complications. After adjustment, favorable mRS in our target population was similar to comparison populations: (a) in CeAD, IAT versus no IAT (OR 0.62, p=0.56); (b) In CeAD, IAT versus IVT alone (OR 1.32, p=0.79); and (c) IAT in CeAD versus non-CeAD mechanism of AIS (OR 0.58, p=0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

IAT is a valid alternative therapeutic option for AIS caused by CeAD due to the low complication rate and excellent outcomes observed in this study.

Для цитирования: Jensen Judd, Salottolo Kristin, Frei Donald, Loy David, McCarthy Kathryn, Wagner Jeffrey, Whaley Michelle, Bellon Richard, Bar-Or David. Comprehensive analysis of intra-arterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke due to cervical artery dissection.. Journal of neurointerventional surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012421.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.