MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3748/wjg.v28.i16.1722

Медицинская библиотека · World journal of gastroenterology · 2022

Comment on "Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review".

Bjørsum-Meyer Thomas, Koulaouzidis Anastasios, Baatrup Gunnar

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) was introduced nearly two decades ago. Initially, it was limited by poor image quality and short battery time, but due to technical improvements, it has become an equal diagnostic alternative to optical colonoscopy (OC). Hastened by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, CCE has been introduced in clinical practice to relieve overburdened endoscopy units and move investigations to out-patient clinics. A wider adoption of CCE would be bolstered by positive patient experience, as it offers a diagnostic investigation that is not inferior to other modalities. The shortcomings of CCE include its inability to differentiate adenomatous polyps from hyperplastic polyps. Solving this issue would improve the stratification of patients for polyp removal. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising results in polyp detection and characterization to minimize incomplete CCEs and avoid needless examinations. Onboard AI appears to be a needed application to enable near-real-time decision-making in order to diminish patient waiting times and avoid superfluous subsequent OCs. With this letter, we discuss the potential and role of AI in CCE as a diagnostic tool for the large bowel.

Для цитирования: Bjørsum-Meyer Thomas, Koulaouzidis Anastasios, Baatrup Gunnar. Comment on "Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review".. World journal of gastroenterology. 2022. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i16.1722.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.