DOI 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.101605
Comparison of efficacy, adverse effects and costs between 20 % ALA-PDT and 10 % ALA-PDT for the treatment of actinic keratosis in Chinese patients.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a reliable treatment for actinic keratosis (AK), though the concentration of 20 % is applied in most ALA-PDT for the treatment of AK, it was found that 10 % ALA could achieve similar outcome during clinical practice. However, there are limited number of reports comparing the efficacy and the safety of ALA-PDT with different ALA doses when treating AK.
OBJECTIVES
This study was designed to compare the efficacy, the adverse effects and the costs of 10 % and 20 % ALA-PDT for AK treatment.
METHODS
We reviewed the records of patients who had received ALA-PDT in our department between January 1, 2012, and April 30, 2017, the efficacy, the adverse effects were recorded, and the costs were analyzed. Follow-up data were collected until April 30, 2018.
RESULTS
A total of 59 AK patients' records were analyzed for the efficacy, the adverse events, the recurrence and the costs. All the AK lesions were tapped with plum-blossom needle as a pre-treatment before receiving ALA-PDT. There was no statistical difference between 10 % ALA-PDT and 20 % ALA-PDT in terms of efficacy and adverse events. In the 10 % ALA group, there was one recurrence out of 34 patients and in the 20 % group there were none. The average treatment cost of each lesion was significantly lower in 10 % ALA group than in 20 % ALA group.
CONCLUSIONS
10 % ALA-PDT has similar efficacy and adverse effects as 20 % ALA-PDT with lower costs. Taken together, this supports the use of 10 % ALA-PDT in clinical practice.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.