MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/09546634.2019.1662879

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of dermatological treatment · 2019

Treatment responder analysis in actinic keratosis: can it lead the way to individualized choice of treatment?

Schmitz Lutz, Hansen Jes B, Bastian Mike, Larsson Thomas, Stockfleth Eggert

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

It is unclear if there are any distinct AK patient populations that might respond best to a given treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To identify if a distinct subgroup of patients with AK might respond better to treatment with ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) versus diclofenac sodium (DS).

METHODS

Complete clearance of AK and mean lesion reduction at end of first treatment course and week 17 were evaluated within subgroups.

RESULTS

502 patients (255 IngMeb; 247 DS) were included in the analysis. At week 17, complete clearance was achieved by more patients treated with IngMeb versus DS within the majority of patient subgroups, including patients with <6 lesions and ≥6 lesions at baseline, aged ≥65 years, males, females, Fitzpatrick skin types II and III, and facial lesions. Mean lesion reduction at week 17 was greater with IngMeb than DS within the same subgroups, and in patients with scalp lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

This responder analysis did not identify any distinct population that responded more optimally than others with IngMeb or DS. More patients achieved complete clearance and higher lesion reduction of AK with IngMeb compared with DS in most subgroups.

Для цитирования: Schmitz Lutz, Hansen Jes B, Bastian Mike, Larsson Thomas, Stockfleth Eggert. Treatment responder analysis in actinic keratosis: can it lead the way to individualized choice of treatment?. The Journal of dermatological treatment. 2019. DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1662879.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.