Transplantation · 2014
Elevated bronchoalveolar lavage eosinophilia correlates with poor outcome after lung transplantation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Verleden Stijn E, Ruttens David, Vandermeulen Elly, van Raemdonck Dirk E, Vanaudenaerde Bart M, Verleden Geert M, Vos Robin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Eosinophils are involved in the pathophysiology of many respiratory diseases, but the exact role of eosinophilia in lung transplantation has not been thoroughly investigated.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of our transplanted patients between 2001 and 2011, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Using a cutoff of ≥2% eosinophilia in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival and overall survival was compared between 66 patients demonstrating at least one BAL with eosinophils ≥2% and 253 control patients (never BAL ≥2%).
RESULTS: Patients with increased BAL eosinophilia demonstrated worse CLAD-free and overall survival (both P<0.0001) compared with controls. Eosinophilic BAL predisposed to development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome but particularly to restrictive allograft syndrome (P<0.0001). After correction for covariates, the association between eosinophilic BAL and CLAD but equally death remained significant (P=0.0047 and 0.0011). Blood eosinophil and C-reactive protein levels were also elevated at the time of eosinophilic BAL.
CONCLUSION: BAL eosinophilia ≥2% is associated with poor outcome in our lung transplant patients as demonstrated by worse CLAD-free and overall survival. Interestingly, increased BAL eosinophilia may be specifically associated with the development of restrictive allograft syndrome, which needs further prospective investigation.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of our transplanted patients between 2001 and 2011, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Using a cutoff of ≥2% eosinophilia in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival and overall survival was compared between 66 patients demonstrating at least one BAL with eosinophils ≥2% and 253 control patients (never BAL ≥2%).
RESULTS: Patients with increased BAL eosinophilia demonstrated worse CLAD-free and overall survival (both P<0.0001) compared with controls. Eosinophilic BAL predisposed to development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome but particularly to restrictive allograft syndrome (P<0.0001). After correction for covariates, the association between eosinophilic BAL and CLAD but equally death remained significant (P=0.0047 and 0.0011). Blood eosinophil and C-reactive protein levels were also elevated at the time of eosinophilic BAL.
CONCLUSION: BAL eosinophilia ≥2% is associated with poor outcome in our lung transplant patients as demonstrated by worse CLAD-free and overall survival. Interestingly, increased BAL eosinophilia may be specifically associated with the development of restrictive allograft syndrome, which needs further prospective investigation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultBiomarkersBiopsyBronchiolitis ObliteransBronchoalveolar LavageBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidC-Reactive ProteinChi-Square DistributionDisease-Free SurvivalEosinophilsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukocyte CountLungLung TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisProportional Hazards ModelsPulmonary EosinophiliaRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsUp-RegulationYoung Adult