Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2024
Excellent accuracy of trained neonatal nurses in the detection of referral-warranted retinopathy of prematurity within an established telemedicine screening programme.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nguyen Thuan Anh Le, Raileanu Vanessa, Smith Bernice, Griffin Alison, Shah Shaheen
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate level of agreement of specialist trained retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) nurses compared with an experienced paediatric ophthalmologist in detection of referral-warranted ROP (RWROP) using wide-field digital retinal imaging.
METHODS: This is a prospective, observational, blinded study of neonates in a level III neonatal intensive care unit, from July 2020 to November 2022. Image capture using wide-field digital retinal imaging followed by ROP grading and staging was completed by trained ROP nurses. This was then compared with findings by an experienced paediatric ophthalmologist. The primary outcome was presence of RWROP in either eye.
RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-five neonates (55% male) with a total of 768 screening visits were included. At the initial screen, nurse and ophthalmologist agreed about presence of RWROP for 191 of 195 neonates (98%, kappa = 0.79, P < 0.0001), with 100% sensitivity for RWROP detection. Including all 768 screening episodes, agreement was 98% for RWROP. There was disagreement in 16 screenings (2%) for 11 (6%) neonates. Of the five screenings (0.7%) that the ophthalmologist thought were RWROP and the nurse did not, three were disagreements about whether the zone was posterior zone 2 or zone 1.
CONCLUSIONS: We found excellent levels of agreement and add evidence that interpretations by specialist trained nurses could be safely integrated into a 'hybrid ROP screening system'.
METHODS: This is a prospective, observational, blinded study of neonates in a level III neonatal intensive care unit, from July 2020 to November 2022. Image capture using wide-field digital retinal imaging followed by ROP grading and staging was completed by trained ROP nurses. This was then compared with findings by an experienced paediatric ophthalmologist. The primary outcome was presence of RWROP in either eye.
RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-five neonates (55% male) with a total of 768 screening visits were included. At the initial screen, nurse and ophthalmologist agreed about presence of RWROP for 191 of 195 neonates (98%, kappa = 0.79, P < 0.0001), with 100% sensitivity for RWROP detection. Including all 768 screening episodes, agreement was 98% for RWROP. There was disagreement in 16 screenings (2%) for 11 (6%) neonates. Of the five screenings (0.7%) that the ophthalmologist thought were RWROP and the nurse did not, three were disagreements about whether the zone was posterior zone 2 or zone 1.
CONCLUSIONS: We found excellent levels of agreement and add evidence that interpretations by specialist trained nurses could be safely integrated into a 'hybrid ROP screening system'.