Chest · 2011
Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute eosinophilic pneumonia.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Ji Eun, Rhee Chin Kook, Lim Ji Hwan, Lee Sang Min, Shim Young Soo, Lee Choon-Taek, Won Lee Sei
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is an idiopathic disease characterized by pulmonary eosinophilia. Because the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) is a surrogate of eosinophilic inflammation, we evaluated the levels, changed treatments, and the diagnostic role of Feno in patients with AEP.
METHODS: Between June 2010 and March 2011, we prospectively enrolled patients at the Armed Forces Capital Hospital who had pulmonary infiltrates and a febrile illness and who were clinically suspected to have AEP. We measured Feno twice at the initial visit (pretreatment) and 2 weeks after the initial measurement (posttreatment).
RESULTS: A total of 60 subjects were enrolled, and 31 were given a diagnosis of AEP. The pretreatment Feno levels of the patients with AEP were significantly higher than those of the patients without AEP (median, 48 parts per billion [ppb] [range, 10-138] vs 14 ppb [range, 5-41]; P < .001). The cut-off value (23.5 ppb) showed that the maximal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve predicted AEP with a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.83. The posttreatment Feno levels decreased significantly in the patients with AEP, and the levels were similar to the patients without AEP (median, 19 ppb [range, 7-44] vs 14 ppb [range, 1-58]; P = .21)
CONCLUSIONS: The Feno level was significantly higher in patients with AEP than in those without AEP. Feno measurement can be used as a diagnostic tool to differentiate patients with AEP from those without AEP.
TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01152424; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
METHODS: Between June 2010 and March 2011, we prospectively enrolled patients at the Armed Forces Capital Hospital who had pulmonary infiltrates and a febrile illness and who were clinically suspected to have AEP. We measured Feno twice at the initial visit (pretreatment) and 2 weeks after the initial measurement (posttreatment).
RESULTS: A total of 60 subjects were enrolled, and 31 were given a diagnosis of AEP. The pretreatment Feno levels of the patients with AEP were significantly higher than those of the patients without AEP (median, 48 parts per billion [ppb] [range, 10-138] vs 14 ppb [range, 5-41]; P < .001). The cut-off value (23.5 ppb) showed that the maximal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve predicted AEP with a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.83. The posttreatment Feno levels decreased significantly in the patients with AEP, and the levels were similar to the patients without AEP (median, 19 ppb [range, 7-44] vs 14 ppb [range, 1-58]; P = .21)
CONCLUSIONS: The Feno level was significantly higher in patients with AEP than in those without AEP. Feno measurement can be used as a diagnostic tool to differentiate patients with AEP from those without AEP.
TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01152424; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Acute DiseaseAdministration, OralAdolescentAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiomarkersBreath TestsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidBronchoscopyDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMethylprednisoloneNitric OxidePredictive Value of TestsPrednisoloneProspective StudiesPulmonary EosinophiliaReference ValuesRepublic of KoreaTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung Adult