Journal of electrocardiology · 2023
Comparison of two artificial intelligence-augmented ECG approaches: Machine learning and deep learning.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kashou Anthony H, May Adam M, Noseworthy Peter A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence-augmented ECG (AI-ECG) refers to the application of novel AI solutions for complex ECG interpretation tasks. A broad variety of AI-ECG approaches exist, each having differing advantages and limitations relating to their creation and application.
PURPOSE: To provide illustrative comparison of two general AI-ECG modeling approaches: machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL).
METHOD COMPARISON: Two AI-ECG algorithms were developed to carry out two separate tasks using ML and DL, respectively. ML modeling techniques were used to create algorithms designed for automatic wide QRS complex tachycardia differentiation into ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia. A DL algorithm was formulated for the task of comprehensive 12‑lead ECG interpretation. First, we describe the ML models for WCT differentiation, which rely upon expert domain knowledge to identify and formulate ECG features (e.g., percent monophasic time-voltage area [PMonoTVA]) that enable strong diagnostic performance. Second, we describe the DL method for comprehensive 12‑lead ECG interpretation, which relies upon the independent recognition and analysis of a virtually incalculable number of ECG features from a vast collection of standard 12‑lead ECGs.
CONCLUSION: We have showcased two different AI-ECG methods, namely ML and DL respectively. In doing so, we highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. It is essential for investigators to understand these differences when attempting to create and apply novel AI-ECG solutions.
PURPOSE: To provide illustrative comparison of two general AI-ECG modeling approaches: machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL).
METHOD COMPARISON: Two AI-ECG algorithms were developed to carry out two separate tasks using ML and DL, respectively. ML modeling techniques were used to create algorithms designed for automatic wide QRS complex tachycardia differentiation into ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia. A DL algorithm was formulated for the task of comprehensive 12‑lead ECG interpretation. First, we describe the ML models for WCT differentiation, which rely upon expert domain knowledge to identify and formulate ECG features (e.g., percent monophasic time-voltage area [PMonoTVA]) that enable strong diagnostic performance. Second, we describe the DL method for comprehensive 12‑lead ECG interpretation, which relies upon the independent recognition and analysis of a virtually incalculable number of ECG features from a vast collection of standard 12‑lead ECGs.
CONCLUSION: We have showcased two different AI-ECG methods, namely ML and DL respectively. In doing so, we highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. It is essential for investigators to understand these differences when attempting to create and apply novel AI-ECG solutions.