Effect of Non-Ablative Non-Thermal CO2 Laser on Drug-Resistant Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Pilot Study.
Аннотация
Background
Trigeminal neuralgia is one of the most severe pain conditions that humans experience. Drug resistance is a challenging event during treatment that results in using higher doses of drugs or referring for neurosurgical treatment. Laser therapy is also an effective method for pain control.
Objective
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of non-ablative non-thermal CO2 laser (NANTCL) on reducing pain in patients with drug-resistant trigeminal neuralgia (DRTN) for the very first time. Materials and methods: Twenty-four patients with DRTN were randomly divided into laser and placebo groups. Patients in the laser group received NANTCL (10,600 nm, 1.1 W, 100 HZ, 20 sec) on trigger points that were covered with lubricant gel 3 days in a week for 2 weeks. The placebo group received sham laser. The patients were requested to grade their pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) immediately, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after treatment.
Results
In the laser group, the results revealed a significant decrease between the initial pain and the pain in all follow-up sessions. Only in three patients, 3 months after completion of laser therapy, pain returned to the initial level. In the control group, a significant difference was seen only between the pain of baseline and final session of laser irradiation. In laser group, the mean of pain (VAS) was lower than the placebo group in all follow-up sessions; however, it was only significant for 1 week after laser therapy.
Conclusions
This study revealed that short-period application of NANTCL is effective for pain relief in patients with DRTN, especially those with extraoral trigger points. Clinical trial registration number: IRCT2013052113406N1.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.