MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/08869634.2023.2197828

Медицинская библиотека · Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice · 2023

Knowledge and experience of dentists with patients with trigeminal neuralgia: A prospective, cross-sectional survey study.

Tuncer Zeynep, Akbulut Nurcan, Ozturk Vesile, Beyaz Serbülent Gökhan

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and orofacial pain (OFP) patients frequently refer to dentists. It is often confused with odontogenic pain and dental procedures are performed. In this study, the authors aimed to reveal the knowledge and experience of dentists about TN.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study that includes dentists who participate in volunteering via an online questionnaire. The questionnaire form contains demographic data, TN treatment, and diagnosis consisting of 18 questions.

RESULTS

The data of 229 dentists were examined. Almost 82% of the participants reportedly knew the diagnostic criteria of TN and 61.6% reported that they had previously referred patients with TN. The most frequently confused diagnosis was odontogenic pains (45.9%).

CONCLUSION

TN diagnostic criteria should be included more often in the education of dentists. Thus, it is possible to prevent unnecessary dental procedures. There is a need to increase knowledge on this subject with further studies involving dental students.

Для цитирования: Tuncer Zeynep, Akbulut Nurcan, Ozturk Vesile, Beyaz Serbülent Gökhan. Knowledge and experience of dentists with patients with trigeminal neuralgia: A prospective, cross-sectional survey study.. Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice. 2023. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2023.2197828.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.