MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11547-025-01981-5

Медицинская библиотека · La Radiologia medica · 2025

Personalized screening based on risk and density: prevalence data from the RIBBS study.

Caumo Francesca, Gennaro Gisella, Ravaioli Alessandra, Baldan Enrica, Bezzon Elisabetta, Bottin Silvia, Carlevaris Paolo, Ciampani Lina, Coran Alessandro, Dal Bosco Chiara, Del Genio Sara, Dalla Pietà Alessia, Falcini Fabio, Maggetto Federico, Manco Giuseppe, Masiero Tiziana, Petrioli Maria, Polico Ilaria, Pisapia Tiziana, Zemella Martina, Zorzi Manuel, Zovato Stefania, Bucchi Lauro

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To present the prevalence screening results of the RIsk-Based Breast Screening (RIBBS) study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05675085), a quasi-experimental population-based study evaluating a personalized screening model for women aged 45-49. This model uses digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and stratifies participants by risk and breast density, incorporating tailored screening intervals with or without supplemental imaging (ultrasound, US, and breast MRI), with the goal of reducing advanced breast cancer (BC) incidence compared to annual digital mammography (DM).

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

An interventional cohort of 10,269 women aged 45 was enrolled (January 2020-December 2021. Participants underwent DBT and completed a BC risk questionnaire. Volumetric breast density and lifetime risk were used to assign five subgroups to tailored screening regimens: low-risk low-density (LR-LD), low-risk high-density (LR-HD), intermediate-risk low-density (IR-LD), intermediate-risk high-density (IR-HD), and high-risk (HR). Screening performance was compared with an observational control cohort of 43,838 women undergoing annual DM.

RESULTS

Compared to LR-LD, intermediate-risk groups showed a 4.9- (IR-LD) and 4.6-fold (IR-HD) higher prevalence of BC, driven by a 7.1- and 7.1-fold higher prevalence of pT1c tumors. The interventional cohort had lower recall rate (rate ratio, 0.5), higher surgery rate (1.9) and increased prevalence of DCIS (2.9), pT1c (2.3) and grade 3 tumors (2.4), compared to controls.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence screening demonstrated the feasibility of using DBT and -in high-density subgroups- supplemental US. The stratification criteria effectively identified subpopulations with different BC prevalence. Increasing the detection rate of pT1c tumors is not sufficient but necessary to achieve a reduction in advanced BC incidence.

Для цитирования: Caumo Francesca, Gennaro Gisella, Ravaioli Alessandra, Baldan Enrica, Bezzon Elisabetta, Bottin Silvia, Carlevaris Paolo, Ciampani Lina, Coran Alessandro, Dal Bosco Chiara, Del Genio Sara, Dalla Pietà Alessia, Falcini Fabio, Maggetto Federico, Manco Giuseppe, Masiero Tiziana, Petrioli Maria, Polico Ilaria, Pisapia Tiziana, Zemella Martina, Zorzi Manuel, Zovato Stefania, Bucchi Lauro. Personalized screening based on risk and density: prevalence data from the RIBBS study.. La Radiologia medica. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-025-01981-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.