Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024
Performance of high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting clinically occult early breast cancers: a multi-reader study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Chae Woon, Shin Hee Jung, Kim Hee Jeong, Baek Seunghee, Park Seo Young, Choi Woo Jung, Chae Eun Young, Cha Joo Hee, Kim Hak Hee, Moon Woo Kyung
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare mammography, breast ultrasound (US), high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI (DCE-MRI), and their combinations for detecting clinically occult early breast cancers (EBCs), including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
METHODS: Three hundred and three consecutive women with screening imaging-detected early breast cancers (60 pure DCIS, 36 DCIS with microinvasion, and 207 invasive carcinoma less than 20 mm) who underwent breast MRI at 3 T including DW-MRI (b-values of 0, 800 and 1200 s/mm2; in-plane resolution, 1.1 × 1.1 mm2 or 1.3 × 1.3 mm2; section thickness, 3 mm) were retrospectively reviewed. Three radiologists independently reviewed each examination. Statistical analysis included Chi-square test, McNemar test for comparison of cancer detection rates, and Fleiss' Kappa for interreader agreement. Mixed-effect logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate factors associated with cancer detection on DW-MRI.
RESULTS: The overall cancer detection rates were 54.8% on mammography, 71.0% on breast US, 81.5% on DW-MRI, and 87.1% on DCE-MRI. On McNemar test, DW-MRI detected more cancers than mammography (adjusted p < 0.001), and its combination with mammography showed a similar cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI combined with mammography (adjusted p = 0.808). On multivariable analysis, histologic type, lesion size, ADC and CNR on DW-MRI were independent factors for cancer detection on DW-MRI. The interreader agreement for cancer detection was moderate to substantial (Fleiss' kappa: 0.52-0.65) across each modality.
CONCLUSION: High-resolution DW-MRI plus mammography showed comparable cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI plus mammography for detecting clinically occult EBCs including DCIS.
METHODS: Three hundred and three consecutive women with screening imaging-detected early breast cancers (60 pure DCIS, 36 DCIS with microinvasion, and 207 invasive carcinoma less than 20 mm) who underwent breast MRI at 3 T including DW-MRI (b-values of 0, 800 and 1200 s/mm2; in-plane resolution, 1.1 × 1.1 mm2 or 1.3 × 1.3 mm2; section thickness, 3 mm) were retrospectively reviewed. Three radiologists independently reviewed each examination. Statistical analysis included Chi-square test, McNemar test for comparison of cancer detection rates, and Fleiss' Kappa for interreader agreement. Mixed-effect logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate factors associated with cancer detection on DW-MRI.
RESULTS: The overall cancer detection rates were 54.8% on mammography, 71.0% on breast US, 81.5% on DW-MRI, and 87.1% on DCE-MRI. On McNemar test, DW-MRI detected more cancers than mammography (adjusted p < 0.001), and its combination with mammography showed a similar cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI combined with mammography (adjusted p = 0.808). On multivariable analysis, histologic type, lesion size, ADC and CNR on DW-MRI were independent factors for cancer detection on DW-MRI. The interreader agreement for cancer detection was moderate to substantial (Fleiss' kappa: 0.52-0.65) across each modality.
CONCLUSION: High-resolution DW-MRI plus mammography showed comparable cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI plus mammography for detecting clinically occult EBCs including DCIS.