MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/sle.0000000000000651

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques · 2019

Clinical Outcome and Surgical Technique of Laparoscopic Posterior Rectopexy Using the Mesh With Anti-adhesion Coating.

Matsuda Yasunori, Nishikawa Masahiro, Nishizawa Satoshi, Yane Yoshinori, Ushijima Hokuto, Tokuhara Taigo

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

We herein present an innovative technique of laparoscopic posterior mesh rectopexy (LPMR) for full-thickness rectal prolapse and report the clinical outcomes in our institution. Ten consecutive patients who were treated with our latest LPMR technique using mesh with an anti-adhesion coating from June 2014 to May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were women with a mean age of 63.6 years (range, 39 to 82 y). The median operative time and blood loss volume were 197.5 minutes (range, 156 to 285 min) and 0 mL (range, 0 to 152 mL), respectively. No perioperative complications occurred, including surgical site infection, pneumonia, urinary dysfunction, and intestinal obstruction. The median follow-up duration was 768 days (range, 396 to 1150 d). During the follow-up, the cumulative incidence of full-thickness rectal prolapse and any mesh-related complications was 0. It may be possible to eliminate retroperitoneal closure using a mesh with an anti-adhesion coating. Our LPMR technique appears safe and acceptable.

Для цитирования: Matsuda Yasunori, Nishikawa Masahiro, Nishizawa Satoshi, Yane Yoshinori, Ushijima Hokuto, Tokuhara Taigo. Clinical Outcome and Surgical Technique of Laparoscopic Posterior Rectopexy Using the Mesh With Anti-adhesion Coating.. Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques. 2019. DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000651.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.