MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.anl.2016.12.006

Медицинская библиотека · Auris, nasus, larynx · 2017

Facial nerve paralysis associated with temporal bone masses.

Nishijima Hironobu, Kondo Kenji, Kagoya Ryoji, Iwamura Hitoshi, Yasuhara Kazuo, Yamasoba Tatsuya

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical and electrophysiological features of facial nerve paralysis (FNP) due to benign temporal bone masses (TBMs) and elucidate its differences as compared with Bell's palsy.

METHODS

FNP assessed by the House-Brackmann (HB) grading system and by electroneurography (ENoG) were compared retrospectively.

RESULTS

We reviewed 914 patient records and identified 31 patients with FNP due to benign TBMs. Moderate FNP (HB Grades II-IV) was dominant for facial nerve schwannoma (FNS) (n=15), whereas severe FNP (Grades V and VI) was dominant for cholesteatomas (n=8) and hemangiomas (n=3). The average ENoG value was 19.8% for FNS, 15.6% for cholesteatoma, and 0% for hemangioma. Analysis of the correlation between HB grade and ENoG value for FNP due to TBMs and Bell's palsy revealed that given the same ENoG value, the corresponding HB grade was better for FNS, followed by cholesteatoma, and worst in Bell's palsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Facial nerve damage caused by benign TBMs could depend on the underlying pathology. Facial movement and ENoG values did not correlate when comparing TBMs and Bell's palsy. When the HB grade is found to be unexpectedly better than the ENoG value, TBMs should be included in the differential diagnosis.

Для цитирования: Nishijima Hironobu, Kondo Kenji, Kagoya Ryoji, Iwamura Hitoshi, Yasuhara Kazuo, Yamasoba Tatsuya. Facial nerve paralysis associated with temporal bone masses.. Auris, nasus, larynx. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2016.12.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.